Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Frolik noted that Mr. Sharp had indicated to her that his preference was the west lot line for the <br />drive-way location. <br /> <br />Vice Chairperson Deemer stated the only problem with the site plan is the multiple buildings. He <br />askezi Mr. Sharp/he could redesign the plan so the principal business building could be expanded, <br />as opposed to developing three separate buildings. Mr. Sharp announced he wanted an additional <br />building to be used as a greenhouse and it would need to be a separate structure also. <br /> <br />Vice Chairperson Deemer turned the meeting over to Chairperson Bawden at 7:47 p.m. <br /> <br />Zoning Administrator Frolik stated Mr. Sharp has three buildings projected for the property and the <br />greenhouse would be a fourth. She said a site plan review of anticipated construction to occur within <br />the next 12 months is generally accepmhle. However, building elevations have not been received for <br />the additional two garages or the greenhouse. Mr. Sharp indicated concern regarding the additional <br />cost of building elevations. Commissioner Deemer stated elevations were needed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer asked fi.the request could be tabled until additional visual information was <br />received. Mr. Sharp stated tabling was unacceptable and indicated the foundation for hls home has <br />akeady been poured and szJd his finances are t/ed into the main mortgage, including the ext~or <br />buildings and the house. <br /> <br />Zoning Administrator Frotik suggested passing the 1,064 square foot commercial structure and <br />leaving the escrow account open and returning to the February Planning Commission meeting with <br />plans for the additional buildings deled. <br /> <br />Commfiss~oner Deemer stated the number of commercial structures and their appearance is the <br />concern of the Cc mmisslon. Mr. Sharp stated he had his house plans with Mm, but not plans for the <br />other buildings. He said all the buildings would be similar in appearance ofkis house. <br /> <br />Commissioner Terry askedwhere Mr. Sharp planned on ~toring bls equipment. Mr. Sharp stated he <br />planned on constructing a building for equipment storage and indicated luring no plans for equipment <br />to be parked on the lot. He said he would be able to eliminate one building and park equipment <br />outside. Commissioner Terry stated preference of the equipment being stored inside and noted that <br />the pines would not provide adequate screening. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jenson inquired h"Mr. Sharp had prepared figures on the cost effectiveness of merging <br />the b~dings into one. Mr, Sharp stated he had been considering adding onto the principal building <br />but an expansion would result in additional costs due to the frost footings. He indicated that it is <br />more cost efficient to construct the additional space needed on floating slabs. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Jenson, seconded by Commissioner Deemer, to recommend that City <br />Council grant site plan approval to Mr. Sharp's site plan for a 1,0{54 sq. ft. commercial building on <br />Lot 10 in ?ineview Estates 2nd Addition PUD contingent upon compliance with City Staff review <br />letter dated December 9, 1997. <br /> <br />l>lanning Commission/January 6, 1998 <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />