Laserfiche WebLink
CASE <br /> <br />INTRODUCE RIGHT-OF-WAY ORDINANCE <br /> By: Steve Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Since the spring of 1996, the League of Minnesota Cities and the City of Redwood Falls have <br />been involved in a dispute with U.S. West Communications and other telecommunications <br />interests over the scope of municipal authority to manage and regulate telecommunication <br />companies using city fight-of-ways. With multiple telecommunication providers on the horizon, <br />we may not know whose facility we may be working with or around. The purpose of this case is <br />to introduce an ordinance regulating the use of city right-of-way. It is based upon a model <br />ordinance developed in cooperation between the City Engineers Association of Minnesota and <br />the League of Minnesota Cities. <br /> <br />The intended purpose of the model is to give cities a uniform set of regulations to help them <br />govern the use of their rights-of-way. It is intended to provide a single set of regulations that <br />cities can apply to ail right-of-way users, including telecommunications companies. The <br />ordinance conforms to the provisions of the new telecommunications fight-of-way legislation <br />adopted into law as Minn. Session Laws 1997, Chapter 123 (Chapter 123). In particular, the <br />ordinance implements a city's authority to manage its fight-of-ways and to recover its actual <br />costs incurred in managing excavations and/or obstruction within the right-of-way. <br /> <br />It should be noted that all the issues were not resolved by the time the legislature adjourned, so <br />the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) was directed to establish a task force to draft rules and a <br />model ordinance relating to the placement of utilities in public rights-of-way. The legislation <br />gave the PUC until March 1, 1998, to adopt the new rules. In the absence of adopted rules, the <br />legislation authorized city's to adopt their own regulations. The PUC has notified the legislature <br />they will be requesting an extension until December 31, 1998, to promulgate the rules. Cities, <br />therefore, have the authority to adopt their own regulations for this construction season, but it is <br />also likely that this ordinance may need to be revised when the PUC completes its work. <br /> <br />The ordinance addresses the terms and conditions under which utilities may locate their facilities <br />in our rights-of-way, as defined by the law. Most notable elements of the ordinance are as <br />follows: <br /> <br />Registration with the City so we know who to contact; <br /> <br />Permitting requirements and fees so we will be reimbursed for staff time, mapping, and <br />supporting costs when working around their facilities; <br /> <br />Restoration requirements that encourage coordinating with our annual reconstruction <br />program, and avoid digging up recently constructed streets; <br /> <br /> <br />