Laserfiche WebLink
CASE #: / <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A TWO-FAMILY <br />RENTAL UNIT IN THE SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT; <br /> CASE OF SCOTT AND GWYN SIMPSON <br /> By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Scott and Gwyn Simpson have resided at 15952 Nowthen Blvd. N.W. for eight years. They <br />acquired the property at 16001 Nowthen Blvd. N.W. in 1997 and have applied for a conditional <br />use permit to operate the dwelling at that address as a duplex. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />The property at 16001 Nowthen Blvd. N.W. is zoned R-1 Rural Residential, which is intended to <br />accommodate single family homes. The design of the house and records on file at the City <br />clearly reflect that the house has been operated as an illegal two family or duplex dwelling for <br />many years. The Simpsons purchased the property in 1997 as an investment with the intent of <br />· continuing to operate it as a duplex. When the Simpson's went to refinance the dwelling, the <br />appraiser could not appraise the structure as it is zoned (Single Family) when the duplex use is so <br />obvious. The appraiser advised the Simpsons that it would be to their advantage to obtain a <br />conditional use permit. <br /> <br />The Simpsons have stated in their letter of application that the dwelling is taxed as a duplex, <br />which is not totally accurate. First of all, taxing and zoning classifications are two separate <br />issues. For taxing purposes, the County Assessor classifies properties according to their use, not <br />how they are zoned by the City, and the taxing classification doesn't justify illegal uses. In the <br />Simpsons case, the dwelling is classified as a duplex at the County but their records indicate that <br />the property is homesteaded and 'paying the same tax rate as an owner occupied single family <br />home. <br /> <br />Council may question how such an obvious duplex structure received a building permit and <br />certificate of occupancy in a single family district. I am providing copies of records, that are <br />public information, that indicate the Building Inspector was suspicious of the floor plan that <br />included a kitchen on both levels. However, two kitchens in a single family dwelling is not a <br />violation. The records also indicate that there was an interior stairway between the upper and <br />lower level and therefore no physical separation between the two levels. Apparently, some time <br />after the certificate of occupancy was issued, the interior connection between the upper and lower <br />level, the stairway, was removed and the duplex use was established. <br /> <br />In the past the City has issued two conditional use permits for duplex uses in single family <br />districts. The first was at 164th and St. Francis Blvd.; the structure was built in 1970 and the <br />City Administrator administratively issued a conditional use permit for the duplex in 1976. The <br />second was in the 5500 block of 149th Avenue; the township Planning Commission issued a <br />building permit for it in 1971 and the City Administrator administratively issued a conditional <br />use permit for it in 1977. No record of any conditional use permit terms can be found. The City <br /> <br /> <br />