My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/23/1998
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1998
>
Agenda - Council - 06/23/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 3:38:10 PM
Creation date
9/17/2003 10:52:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/23/1998
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
324
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CITY FINANCE IN MINNESOTA <br /> <br />Just two years ago, Minnesota cities, school districts, and counties were faced with the likelihood of large <br />reductions in state aids, due to the deteriorating financial condition of the State. Since that time, the State <br />has incurred budget surpluses amounting to billions of dollars. Thus far, these surpluses have primarily been <br />used to implement property tax reform initiatives. This has been great for Minnesota property taxpayers, but <br />municipalities haven't received a significant benefit from these windfalls. Every indication is that the current <br />1998 legislature will continue the trend of compressing property tax class rates, implementing levy limits, <br />adding significant tax increment restrictions and penalties, and returning excess funds collected directly back <br />to taxpayers through rebates, credits, or other types of tax relief. <br /> <br />The following is a brief summary of the 1997 legislative issues and changes relating to city government <br />finance in Minnesota. <br /> <br />Property Tax Reform - The Legislature implemented a number of initiatives aimed at providing <br />various forms of property tax relief and reform. <br /> <br />Class rate changes - Class rates were compressed for several classifications of property <br />including residential homestead, commemial-industrial, apartments, and seasonal recreation <br />property which will spread levies more evenly across existing classes. Commercial/Industrial <br />(C/I) properties benefitted from some of the largest reductions while the class rate for market- <br />rate apartments was also decreased and certain low-income housing will now be treated as a <br />single classification. In addition, target class rates were set for commercial-industrial, apartment, <br />and nonhomestead residential single rental unit property to further reduce those class rates in the <br />future. <br /> <br />Education Homestead Credit - An education homestead credit providing each homestead <br />property with a credit equal to 32% of the property's general education tax was established. The <br />credit is limited to $225 per homestead. The credit is deducted by the County Auditor at the <br />time the property tax statements are determined so that homeowners are not required to file an <br />application to receive the credit. <br /> <br />ProperW. tax rebate - Minnesota homeowners will receive a 20% rebate of their 1997 property <br />taxes paid, while renters will receive 18% of the portion of their rent that constituted property <br />tax payments (about 3.6% of the total rent paid). There is no maximum on the rebate amount. <br />It is claimed on 1997 income tax returns that are filed in 1998. <br /> <br />General education levy reduction - The statewide general education levy was reduced by <br />$93,000,000 per year for taxes payable in 1998 and subsequent years. This basically increased <br />the state's share of education funding from 60% to 65% of the total school levy. The fiscal year <br />1999 levy is expected to require a rate of 35.5% as compared to a rate of 37.4% for fiscal year <br />1998. This estimate will likely be even lower as a result of the additional property tax reform <br />measures as discussed are taken into account. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Limited market value - The maximum amount that a qualifying property owner's market value <br />can change from one year to the next has been changed from 10% or one-third of the difference <br />between the current assessment and the preceding assessment to 10% of the preceding year's <br />value or one-fourth of the difference. <br /> <br />Property. tax abatement - Local governments are allowed to abate their own tax on a particular <br />property if its expected benefit at least equals the cost to the district and finds that doing so is <br />in the public interest (because it will preserve tax base, provide jobs, redevelop blighted areas, <br /> <br />,I <br /> <br />-1- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.