My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/28/1998
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1998
>
Agenda - Council - 07/28/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 3:38:39 PM
Creation date
9/17/2003 11:10:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/28/1998
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
388
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DISCUSS COMMUNICATION ANTENNA PROPOSAL <br />I By: Steve Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Like many of our municipal neighbors, the City of Ramsey has been approached by a wireless <br />communication company to utilize the City's water tower as an antennae site. Attached to this <br />case is a proposal from PageMart Wireless for a five-year lease of the water tower site. Although <br />there is no amount of rent in the proposed agreement, a verbal proposal from PageMart to City <br />Administrator James Norman suggested $400 per month. In checking with our neighboring <br />cities, the following monthly lease rates were reported: <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Blaine: Site 1 $ 870/mo. <br /> Site 2 1,000/mo. <br />Coon Rapids: 1,025/mo. <br />Anoka 1,400/mo. <br /> <br />When the City Administrator inquired about the disparate rate proposed with that of surrounding <br />communities, the PageMart response was that those leases involved different types of equipment. <br /> <br />Observation: <br /> <br />In talking to the City of Blaine, the low rate agreed to for one communication company became a <br />negotiating point of subsequent leases. Renting at a low rate could set a precedent for future <br />leases in the City. Another consideration is the fact that the City is leasing space on its facility, <br />and the type of antennae and equipment is relatively inconsequential. The presence of the <br />antennae and ancillary equipment will have little effect on the structure. However, once we <br />allow another entity to have access and rights to our facility, the City takes on a degree of <br />liability, some operational inconvenience, and some loss of control over the facility. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Staff recommends rejection of the $400/month offer and looks to committee direction on an <br />appropriate minimum lease rate. <br /> <br />Committee Action: <br /> <br />Based on discussion. <br /> <br />Reviewed by: <br />City Administrator <br />Fire Chief/Director of Public Works <br />Finance Officer <br /> <br />R&B: 07/21/98 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.