My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 04/05/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2011
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 04/05/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 12:50:57 PM
Creation date
6/7/2011 1:17:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
04/05/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Elvig commented that the scenario of what you would like is good but he has <br />concerns about no eaves. <br />Mayor Ramsey mentioned two -foot eaves and one -foot gable. If less than 5 5 acres, regardless <br />of exterior material, you have to have an eaves overhang to match the home. <br />Mr. Gladhill reported that right now one would have to apply for a conditional use permit for a <br />two -story accessory building — is Council interested in allowing that to be approved <br />administratively. <br />Councilmember Jeffrey stated that if we only allow it so high — why would we worry about that <br />— do it administratively. <br />Mr. Gladhill stated staff will put that into ordinance format. It will be in front of the Planning <br />Commission in May. <br />2.3) City Survey Proposal <br />City Administrator Ulrich noted that as part of an earlier proposal, the City had already approved <br />$9,000 for a 30- question survey on road reconstruction. At subsequent work sessions, the <br />Council discussed conducting a public safety /police survey, asking more general questions. To <br />increase this survey to 100 questions would cost $15,500 total — an additional $6,500 added to <br />the $9,000. Mr. Ulrich pointed out that the proposal is to survey 300 randomly selected <br />households in the City. A sample of 300 residents would provide results projectable to the entire <br />City adult population within plus or minus 6.0 percent in 95 out of 100 cases. Each additional <br />question unit beyond the initial allotment would be about $139. Mr. Ulrich stated that a draft <br />survey was sent out with the agenda that contained about 80 general questions that could be <br />added to get more of a broad variety of topics. It could be scaled back from the 80 or we could <br />just stick with the 30 original questions. He inquired if there is any interest in pursuing the <br />broader questionnaire. <br />Mayor Ramsey suggested the feeling would be if there are more than 20 questions, there should <br />be some type of compensation for filling out the survey. <br />Mr. Ulrich stated this is a telephone survey. <br />Councilmember Jeffrey stated he could not imagine himself on the phone for hours answering <br />100 questions — this is a tough way to gather data. <br />Councilmember Tossey dittoed Councilmember Jeffrey's statement. <br />Councilmember McGlone thought the idea of public safety questions went down in flames and <br />now it's in here again. He stated he did not appreciate that and stated we do not want to muddy <br />this up. <br />City Council Work Session — April 5, 2011 <br />Page8of12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.