Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Commissioner Brauer, seconded by Vice Chairperson Van Scoy to recommend that <br />City Council approve the Interim Use Permit based on findings of fact; contingent upon <br />compliance with the City Staff Review Letter dated April 28, 2011 with the following changes to <br />conditions: #2 "These IUP uses are for a five year term commencing on the date of approval of <br />this permit or including termination of the IUP in the event the Subject Property is needed for <br />another public purpose including, but not limited to, the construction of Armstrong Boulevard. <br />This IUP is defined in Section 117 -52 of City Code. City Staff will monitor the events for any <br />problems related to traffic, crowd control, noise, and other issues related to public safety ". #3 <br />"The PERMITTEE may operate no more than twice per week and no race shall commence after <br />10:00 p.m." #22 "That the IUP shall abide by all lease terms between the PERMITTEE and the <br />City ". <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chairperson Van Scoy, Commissioners Bauer, Brauer, <br />Dunaway, Field, and Schiller. Voting No: None. Absent: Chairperson Levine. <br />Case #5: Ordinance to Amend City Code Section 117 -349 (Accessory Uses and <br />Buildings) <br />Public Hearing <br />Vice Chairperson Van Scoy called the public hearing to order at 9:00 p.m. <br />Presentation <br />Senior Planner Gladhill presented the Staff Report. <br />Citizen Input <br />Discussion ensued regarding two -story accessory structures and when a conditional use permit <br />should remain a requirement to allow for them. <br />Mr. St Hilaire, 7335 Alpine Drive, stated he has a land locked parcel and would like some <br />resolution to this situation. <br />Senior Planner Gladhill stated these are two separate issues, he was familiar with the situation; <br />however what is being reviewed and discussed today has nothing to do with land locked parcels. <br />He continued that the City has offered various solutions to both parties and their attorneys and <br />this is not something that is going to be resolved tonight. <br />Norman Archer, 15410 Jackel Street, stated he built a two -story structure eleven years ago and a <br />storm came through and now it needs to be replaced. The ordinance in place now does not allow <br />for him to rebuild the structure at the current height. He stated that he has been waiting for this <br />ordinance to be brought forward so he could rebuild. <br />Senior Planner Gladhill described the process of the ordinance to this point. <br />Planning Commission/May 5, 2011 <br />Page l0 of 13 <br />