Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br />:1 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />b) <br /> <br />c) <br /> <br />the modified Program will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound <br />needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Development District by <br />private enterprise; and <br /> <br />the Development District and modified Program conform to the general plan for <br />development of the City as set forth in the comprehensive City Plan. <br /> <br />Section 3. Findings; TIF District Nos 1, 2,4 and 6. - <br /> <br /> 3.01. It is found and determined that it is necessary and desirable for the sound and orderly <br />development of the Development District, and for the protection and preservation of the public <br />health, safety, and general welfare, that the authority of the TIF Act be exercised by the City to <br />provide public financial assistance to the TIF and Development Districts. <br /> <br /> 3.02. It is further found and determined, and it is the reasoned opinion of the City, that the <br />development proposed in the modified Program and TIF Plans could not reasonably be expected to <br />occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that therefore <br />the use of tax increment financing is necessary. The factual basis for this finding is that the only <br />modification proposed in the TIF Plans is to increase expenditures for a combination of public and <br />private improvements throughout the Development District. Significant infrastructure needs <br />remain in parts of the original Development District, and in the area added to the Development <br />District by this modification. Major improvements such as street, sewer and water would not be <br />financially feasible without tax increment assistance; even if some of the improvements were <br />assessable, the amount of assessments required may exceed benefit, and in the City's judgment the <br />assessment burden would impede commercial and industrial development. The TIF Plans also <br />include assistance for a housing facility to be owned by Anoka County Housing and <br />Redevelopment Authority (County HRA) and financed jointly by the City and County HRA. Pro <br />formas for that project indicate that it would not be financially feasible without the tax increment <br />assistance provided in the modified TIF Plans. Finally, the City's historical experience has shown <br />that certain commercial and industrial developments will not occur without tax increment <br />assistance to reduce the cost of land acquisition, site improvements and related development costs. <br /> <br /> 3.03. The proposed public improvements to be financed in part through tax increment <br />financing are necessary to permit the City to realize the full potential of the TIF and Development <br />Districts in terms of development intensity, employment opportunities and tax base. <br /> <br /> 3.04. The modified TIF Plans conform to the general plan of development of the City as a <br />whole. The factual basis for this finding is that the planning commission has reviewed the modified <br />TIF Plans and confirmed that they conform to the comprehensive city plans. <br /> <br /> 3.05. The modified TIF Plans will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound <br />needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the TIF and Development Districts by private <br />enterprise. The factual basis for this finding is that all the improvements and developments <br />proposed in the modified TIF Plans are designed to remove impediments to private development <br />and provide assistance necessary to facilitate such development in accordance with the City's. <br />economic development plans. <br /> <br /> 3.06. This modification does not change the classification or boundaries of any TIF <br />District. TIF District No. 1 remains classified as a redevelopment district under Section 273.73, <br />subd. 10(3) of the TIF Act; TIF District No. 2 remains classified as a redevelopment district under <br />Section 273.73, subd. 10 (a)(2) of the TIF Act; TIF District No. 4 remains classified as a <br />redevelopment district under Section 469.174, Subd. 10(a)(2) of the TIF Act request for; and <br />District No. 6 remains an economic development district under Section 469.174, subd. 12 of the <br />TIF Act (all statutory cites as of the date of request for certification). <br /> <br />SJB- 153315 <br />RA 125-52 <br /> <br /> <br />