Laserfiche WebLink
Zeigler, admitted that Kendig warned them that altering ratios <br /> and multipliers was a tricky business. <br /> Ultimately, the multiple amendments rendered the ordinance <br /> user-unfriendly. Officials in Queen Anne's County made the <br /> decision to adopt a more comprehensible land-use policy. A <br /> traditional ordinance is now in preparation by the staff. <br /> Pocatello, Idaho, officials went through a similar experience <br /> with an ordinance adopted in 1981. It included performance <br /> standards for residential development and used open space <br /> multipliers based on a site's physical geography, surrounding <br /> uses, and other factors to determine maximum densities and <br /> minimum lot sizes. Like Queen Anne's County planners, <br /> Pocarello officials found it difficult to administer and too <br /> complicated to explain to users. Two years ago, the staff <br />. initiated a major revision to simplify the ordinance. Some <br /> performance standards were kept as regulatory requirements, <br /> but the ordinance ultimately adopted a more conventional <br /> Euclidean format. In addition, the authors of.the new <br /> provisions are attempting, in their words, to "reduce the <br /> verbiage and jargon" and make the code more user-friendly. <br /> Largo's planning director, Richard Goss, observed that the <br /> Class 2 "flexible" zoning option was regarded as cumbersome <br /> and complicated for planners and developers alike, accounting <br /> for its infrequent use by property owners. <br /> "Conventional Plus" Zonlng. Communities replacing <br />performance-based ordinances with conventional zoning <br />approaches are not dropping performance standards altogeiiher. <br />In fact, a look at the new ordinances reveals that such standards <br />continue to play a major role in guiding development, echoing <br />the assimilation of performance provisions in zoning ordinances <br />nationwide. Over the past two decades, the science of zoning <br />techniques has matured as planners have gained experience with <br />performance measures such as open space ratios, floor area <br />ratios, buffers, and impervious surface ratios. Clustering and <br />hillside provisions, mixed-use districts, and stream valley <br />protection requirements, which often function much like <br />performance measures, have become commonplace. In <br />returning to conventional zoning formats, communities are <br />retaining many of the same performance measures seen in their <br />previous ordinances. <br /> In Fort Collins, for example, most of the previous <br />performance criteria and standards are incorporated into the <br />new ordinance. Criteria formerly used to evaluate proiects by <br />assigning points for approval are now requirements for project <br />ratification. The old performance standard for landscaping, for <br />example, asked planners how the landscape plan supported <br />functional needs such as visual screening and climate control. <br />;Fhey also had to determine how the standards enhanced the <br />aesthetic appearance of the site and neighborhood and how they <br />integrated and buffered existing natural areas. Four pages of <br />potential examples illustrated ways to achieve that criterion. <br /> In the new ordinance, 11 pages of landscape provisions are <br />spelled out as requirements, providing for tree preservation and <br />replacement, minimum diversity proportions for plant species, <br />specific buffer techniques, and other detailed provisions. Some <br />flexibility in .decision making is retained, however, through the <br />use of "alternative compliance options" and standards as <br />minimum requirements, which can be exceeded as appropriate. <br />In addition, each residential zoning district establishes an <br />average density that allows density variations within a site. <br /> Tallahassee and Leon County, Florida, adopted joint zoning <br />in 1992 that reflected comprehensive planning policies calling <br />for mixed-use development. The zoning placed 70,000 acres <br /> <br />(about 44 percent of the planned urban service area) in mixed- <br />use zoning categories that incorporated performance factors <br />such as impacts on adjacent uses and facilities. Three years later, <br />city and county officials concluded that the approach was faulty, <br />due in part to the unpredictability of allowable land uses. The <br />results were delays for developers, uncertainty for residential <br />neighbors, and a contentious review for zoning administrators. <br />The comprehensive plan was revised to allow for nine types of <br />development patterns within mixed-use areas. Armed with a <br />new GIS data system that assured accurate rezoning, the <br />planning staffproposed 23 new zoning districts. The new <br />zoning became effective on November 1, 1997. Although the <br />new districts will be prescriptive in nature, they will continue to <br />permit some flexibility of use in conformance with the <br />comprehensive plan. <br /> Largo's ordinance revisions retained the concept of buffers <br />but rewrote the requirements to enlarge them and add more <br />landscaping. Largo planners will also continue mitigating <br />impacts to achieve compatibility between old and new uses. The <br />new ordinance requires developers to meet with neighborhood <br />residents and it furnishes some ground rules for the discussions <br />that, as planner Rick Goss puts it, "take a lot of the political <br />crap out of the process." <br /> ' The new ordinance in Queen Anne's County will use a <br />different, but growing, technique to allow flexibility: <br />conditional zoning provisions. If spelled out in the ordinance, <br />these provisions permit many uses within various districts. They <br />must meet certain criteria, however, which can be written as <br />performance measures. Some ordinances simply provide a list of <br />such factors to be considered in the approval process. <br /> <br /> Telephone <br />Community Number <br /> <br />Breckenridge, Colorado <br />Flagstaff, Arizona <br />Fort Collins, Colorado <br />Hardin County, Kentucky <br />Lake County, Illinois' <br />Largo, Florida <br />PocatelJo, Idaho <br />Queen Anne's County, Maryland <br />TaJlahassee, Florida <br /> <br />970-453-3160 <br />602-774-5281 <br />970-221-6750 <br />502-769-5479 <br />847-360-6330 <br />813-587-6700 <br />208-234-6184 <br />410-758-I 255 · <br />850-891-8600 <br /> <br /> Conventional zoning in many communities, therefore, <br />appears to be assimilating performance criteria and standards in <br />a variety of forms, making them less conventional, but more <br />flexible, in application. <br /> <br />The Hardy Few <br />Of the nine communities contacted, Breckenridge and Flagstaff <br />have retained their performance-based zoning. Breckenridge's <br />development code, adopted in 1978, divides the town into 42 <br />districts for which land-use guidelines specify such factors as <br />intensity of use and acceptable uses. All projects are subjected to <br />evaluation using 30 absolute and 11 relative policies that create <br />a point score. Projects may add amenities, design features, and <br />extra infrastructure improvements to offset negative qualities. <br />According to Mark Leidal, the director of current planning, the <br /> <br /> <br />