My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
06/14/11
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
06/14/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2025 11:01:25 AM
Creation date
6/10/2011 11:10:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
Document Date
06/14/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Tossey stated all proceeds should go to this park. He indicated he met with some <br />of the residents and they would prefer there was no more development. However, there would <br />not be a park without a development. In that case, the residents would like to see minimally <br />invasive buildings. He noted it was part of the deal that if this were to be parceled out, the <br />proceeds were to go to the park and not to debt. <br />Commissioner Wise explained since there are funds from other park dedication areas, they could <br />be used for this park. The proceeds from this development could then be used to pay debt. <br />Public Works Director Olson agreed. He said this is a compromise from the neighborhood <br />perspective and the staff perspective. He suggested this would spur other development due to the <br />fact that the development of this area would be enhanced. <br />Commissioner McGlone stated there has been interest in this property and all ideas would be <br />considered at this point. The neighborhood will have a better park than they would have <br />originally because of their involvement. He said he was in favor of using all the funds from the <br />lots for the park. There will be other lots that the funds can be used for debt reduction. <br />Commissioner Wise clarified he is not looking for a lesser park. He said the Commission has to <br />abide by a policy and if the proceeds are not used to pay down debt, he would not support this. <br />Vice Chair Ramsey stated this park would be a catalyst for the neighborhood, and he is in favor <br />of using all the proceeds for the park. <br />Development Manager Lazan sought to clarify that the parcels were not on the Dashboard and <br />income was not anticipated from them. Up until last year, the parcels were labeled "park" so it is <br />unexpected money. <br />Commissioner Tossey stated he would oppose this. He said his concern was the number of the <br />lots and the amount of space that would be there. <br />Public Works Director Olson explained that a member of City Council could approve or <br />disapprove of the site plan and request what the houses would look like and consider any deals <br />struck with adjacent properties. He said they are asking to move forward with the process now. <br />If there is a sale, he asked if Commissioner Tossey would approve that the proceeds go toward <br />the park. <br />Commissioner Tossey stated he would take Mr. Olson's advice and support the plan on how to <br />spend the proceeds but warned he would be very strict on how this is done in the future. <br />City Administrator Ulrich offered a contrary view and suggested if the Commission is <br />proceeding with a concept and going out into the community, the direction of the community <br />would be helpful now. <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority / April 26, 2011 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.