|
Not in Our
<br />Front Yard
<br />
<br /> In the midst of a polarized citizenry, the St. Louis Park,
<br /> Minnesota, city council unanimously approved a zoning
<br /> ordinance text amendment regulating parking in the
<br /> community's residential areas. City officials have responded to
<br /> numerous complaints about recreational and commercial
<br /> vehicles parked in the city's yards and driveways. In 1994, a
<br /> judge invalidated the community's nuisance ordinance dealing
<br /> with parked vehicles on the grounds that it was essentially a
<br /> zoning ordinance adopted without a proper public hearing
<br /> process. The new ordinance is the result of more than a year of
<br /> debate that included a citizen task force with representatives on
<br /> both sides of the issue.
<br /> The ordinance places size limitations on vehicles parked in
<br /> residential areas. Vehicles taller than 'eight feet in height, longer
<br /> than 22 feet, or weighing more than 6,000 pounds cannot be
<br /> parked or stored in front of structures in residential zones. One
<br /> vehicle exceeding the size restrictions may be parked to the rear
<br /> of a residence. No more than three vehicles of any kind may be
<br /> parked or stored outdoors on single-family parcels.
<br /> Supporters of the ordinance cite concerns about the
<br /> effects of both the size and number of vehicles parked in
<br /> driveways and yards throughout the community. Popular
<br /> concerns include the effect on property values, safety, and
<br /> the appropriate character of residential neighborhoods. Some
<br /> residents have suggested that recreational vehicle (RV)
<br /> owners should consider off-site storage to be one of the costs
<br /> associated with owning such v~hicles, According to St. Louis
<br /> Park planning coordinator Judie Erickson, approximately
<br />'half of the city's single-family homes are situated on lots 60
<br /> feet wide or less. Many of the city's lots are 40 feet wide,
<br /> leaving little room for parking RVs and other large vehicles.
<br /> Fewer concerns were noted in those areas of the city served
<br /> by alleys allowing for rear-yard access.
<br /> In addition to the formation of a citizen task force, an
<br />outside mediator was also hired in an attempt to reach an
<br />agreement among the competing factions, but no consensus was
<br />reached. Opponents feel the ordinance will violate their
<br />property rights and send a message that the community is
<br />hostile toward families and their hobbies. Some property owners
<br />have suggested that a legal challenge will ensue.
<br /> The Minneapolis Star Tribune published an editorial praising
<br />St. Louis Park officials for their commitment to protecting
<br />residential neighborhoods from "unsightly blight." The editorial
<br />staff'noted that communities in the Twin Cities area and
<br />throughout the nation are taking similar steps. In neighboring
<br />Hopkins, Minnesota, vehicles over 9,000 pounds are prohibited
<br />
<br />Zoning News is a monthly newsletter published by the American Planning A*sociation.
<br />Subscriptions are available for $50 (U.S.) and $65 {foreign), Frank S. So, Executive Director;,
<br />William R. Klein, Director of Research.
<br />Zoning News is produced at APA. Jim Schwab and Mike Davidson, Editor~; Chris Burke, Fay
<br />Dolnick, Gina Jackaon, Sanjay Jeer, Megan Lewis, Ma~ya Mo,is, Becki Rer~laff, Martin Roupe,
<br />Jatmn Wittenberg, Reporters; Cynthia Cbeski, A~sistant Editor; Lisa Barton, Design and
<br />Production.
<br />Copyright ©1998 by American Planning A*sociafion, 122 S. Michigan Ave., Suite 1600.
<br />Chicago, IL 60603. The American Planning hasociafion has headquarters offices at 1776,
<br />Ma~chusetts Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20036.
<br />All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by
<br />any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information
<br />storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the American Planning
<br />A~sociadon.
<br />Primed on recycled paper, including 50-70% recycled fiber
<br />and 10% postconsumer wasle. ~
<br />
<br />from parking in residential areas. One vehicle longer than 18
<br />feet may be parked to the rear of the property.
<br /> Similar provisions can be found elsewhere. In Lenexa,
<br />Kansas, for example, an RV less than 28 feet long may be
<br />parked on a paved surface in a rear or side yard. The city
<br />may issue a temporary permit for parking an RV in a
<br />driveway for up to 14 days. In Salt Lake City, Utah, a permit
<br />~ust be obtained in order to park an RV in a residential
<br />area. Rear-yard parking is permitted on a hard-surfaced pad
<br />while side-yard parking of an RV is allowed (with
<br />appropriate screening) only when topographical features
<br />prevent rear-yard access.
<br /> Some observers say neighborhood disputes related to large
<br />and numerous vehicles are likely to grow as the RV industry
<br />continues to thrive. Communities will face the challenge of
<br />protecting the integrity of residential areas while responding to
<br />the demands ora growing number of households owning a
<br />small fleet of RVs and automobiles. Jason !g-qttenberg
<br />
<br />Back to the Future
<br />in Chicago
<br />
<br />Many people remember a time, not so long ago, when they
<br />could find a movie theater in their own neighborhood. As strip
<br />malls, big box retail, and other commercial properties became
<br />commonplace, local neighborhood theaters yielded their
<br />business to large multiplex theaters located in suburbs adjacent
<br />to large shopping malls. Inner-city neighborhoods, which had
<br />served as hubs for entertainment, became home to mom-and-
<br />pop stores, empty buildings, and fast food restaurants, leaving
<br />most inner-city movie enthusiasts without theaters in their
<br />communities. This impact was particularly obvious in African
<br />American communities. In Chicago, however, a husband-and-
<br />wife team has formed Inner City Entertainment, a company
<br />scheduled to open three modern multiplex theaters in inner-city
<br />African American communities.
<br /> Inner City Entertainment's theaters are unique not only for
<br />their terra-cotta architecture, but because they are the only
<br />African American-owned theaters in Chicago located in
<br />predominantly African American communities that previously
<br />have been deprived of a sustainable economic base and are not
<br />gentrifying. These theaters are located in planned developments,
<br />eliminating the need for rezoning and allowing greater design
<br />flexibility, with fewer standards to meet and the benefit of more
<br />efficient and economic public improvements.
<br /> The theaters' size will differ at each location, though all three
<br />will have 10 or more screens. The demand for larger theaters
<br />with more movie selections has became obvious with the new
<br />trend of megaplex theaters (see "Big Box Meets Big Screen,"
<br />December 1996). Multiscreen theaters are usually associated
<br />with shopping malls or suburban areas, but gentrification has
<br />begun to make inner-city neighborhoods popular targets for
<br />such development.
<br /> Many communities see theaters as catalysts for new
<br />commercial development, reviving desolate inner-city areas.
<br />Following this premise, the city of Chicago helped acquire the
<br />land and offered financial support to Inner City Entertainment,
<br />whose theaters are located in neighborhoods that have suffered a
<br />steady decline of commercial activity. Inner City Entertainment
<br />plans to hire primarily from the neighborhood and to offer
<br />welfare-to-work programs. Christopher Burke
<br />
<br />
<br />
|