Laserfiche WebLink
Not in Our <br />Front Yard <br /> <br /> In the midst of a polarized citizenry, the St. Louis Park, <br /> Minnesota, city council unanimously approved a zoning <br /> ordinance text amendment regulating parking in the <br /> community's residential areas. City officials have responded to <br /> numerous complaints about recreational and commercial <br /> vehicles parked in the city's yards and driveways. In 1994, a <br /> judge invalidated the community's nuisance ordinance dealing <br /> with parked vehicles on the grounds that it was essentially a <br /> zoning ordinance adopted without a proper public hearing <br /> process. The new ordinance is the result of more than a year of <br /> debate that included a citizen task force with representatives on <br /> both sides of the issue. <br /> The ordinance places size limitations on vehicles parked in <br /> residential areas. Vehicles taller than 'eight feet in height, longer <br /> than 22 feet, or weighing more than 6,000 pounds cannot be <br /> parked or stored in front of structures in residential zones. One <br /> vehicle exceeding the size restrictions may be parked to the rear <br /> of a residence. No more than three vehicles of any kind may be <br /> parked or stored outdoors on single-family parcels. <br /> Supporters of the ordinance cite concerns about the <br /> effects of both the size and number of vehicles parked in <br /> driveways and yards throughout the community. Popular <br /> concerns include the effect on property values, safety, and <br /> the appropriate character of residential neighborhoods. Some <br /> residents have suggested that recreational vehicle (RV) <br /> owners should consider off-site storage to be one of the costs <br /> associated with owning such v~hicles, According to St. Louis <br /> Park planning coordinator Judie Erickson, approximately <br />'half of the city's single-family homes are situated on lots 60 <br /> feet wide or less. Many of the city's lots are 40 feet wide, <br /> leaving little room for parking RVs and other large vehicles. <br /> Fewer concerns were noted in those areas of the city served <br /> by alleys allowing for rear-yard access. <br /> In addition to the formation of a citizen task force, an <br />outside mediator was also hired in an attempt to reach an <br />agreement among the competing factions, but no consensus was <br />reached. Opponents feel the ordinance will violate their <br />property rights and send a message that the community is <br />hostile toward families and their hobbies. Some property owners <br />have suggested that a legal challenge will ensue. <br /> The Minneapolis Star Tribune published an editorial praising <br />St. Louis Park officials for their commitment to protecting <br />residential neighborhoods from "unsightly blight." The editorial <br />staff'noted that communities in the Twin Cities area and <br />throughout the nation are taking similar steps. In neighboring <br />Hopkins, Minnesota, vehicles over 9,000 pounds are prohibited <br /> <br />Zoning News is a monthly newsletter published by the American Planning A*sociation. <br />Subscriptions are available for $50 (U.S.) and $65 {foreign), Frank S. So, Executive Director;, <br />William R. Klein, Director of Research. <br />Zoning News is produced at APA. Jim Schwab and Mike Davidson, Editor~; Chris Burke, Fay <br />Dolnick, Gina Jackaon, Sanjay Jeer, Megan Lewis, Ma~ya Mo,is, Becki Rer~laff, Martin Roupe, <br />Jatmn Wittenberg, Reporters; Cynthia Cbeski, A~sistant Editor; Lisa Barton, Design and <br />Production. <br />Copyright ©1998 by American Planning A*sociafion, 122 S. Michigan Ave., Suite 1600. <br />Chicago, IL 60603. The American Planning hasociafion has headquarters offices at 1776, <br />Ma~chusetts Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20036. <br />All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by <br />any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information <br />storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the American Planning <br />A~sociadon. <br />Primed on recycled paper, including 50-70% recycled fiber <br />and 10% postconsumer wasle. ~ <br /> <br />from parking in residential areas. One vehicle longer than 18 <br />feet may be parked to the rear of the property. <br /> Similar provisions can be found elsewhere. In Lenexa, <br />Kansas, for example, an RV less than 28 feet long may be <br />parked on a paved surface in a rear or side yard. The city <br />may issue a temporary permit for parking an RV in a <br />driveway for up to 14 days. In Salt Lake City, Utah, a permit <br />~ust be obtained in order to park an RV in a residential <br />area. Rear-yard parking is permitted on a hard-surfaced pad <br />while side-yard parking of an RV is allowed (with <br />appropriate screening) only when topographical features <br />prevent rear-yard access. <br /> Some observers say neighborhood disputes related to large <br />and numerous vehicles are likely to grow as the RV industry <br />continues to thrive. Communities will face the challenge of <br />protecting the integrity of residential areas while responding to <br />the demands ora growing number of households owning a <br />small fleet of RVs and automobiles. Jason !g-qttenberg <br /> <br />Back to the Future <br />in Chicago <br /> <br />Many people remember a time, not so long ago, when they <br />could find a movie theater in their own neighborhood. As strip <br />malls, big box retail, and other commercial properties became <br />commonplace, local neighborhood theaters yielded their <br />business to large multiplex theaters located in suburbs adjacent <br />to large shopping malls. Inner-city neighborhoods, which had <br />served as hubs for entertainment, became home to mom-and- <br />pop stores, empty buildings, and fast food restaurants, leaving <br />most inner-city movie enthusiasts without theaters in their <br />communities. This impact was particularly obvious in African <br />American communities. In Chicago, however, a husband-and- <br />wife team has formed Inner City Entertainment, a company <br />scheduled to open three modern multiplex theaters in inner-city <br />African American communities. <br /> Inner City Entertainment's theaters are unique not only for <br />their terra-cotta architecture, but because they are the only <br />African American-owned theaters in Chicago located in <br />predominantly African American communities that previously <br />have been deprived of a sustainable economic base and are not <br />gentrifying. These theaters are located in planned developments, <br />eliminating the need for rezoning and allowing greater design <br />flexibility, with fewer standards to meet and the benefit of more <br />efficient and economic public improvements. <br /> The theaters' size will differ at each location, though all three <br />will have 10 or more screens. The demand for larger theaters <br />with more movie selections has became obvious with the new <br />trend of megaplex theaters (see "Big Box Meets Big Screen," <br />December 1996). Multiscreen theaters are usually associated <br />with shopping malls or suburban areas, but gentrification has <br />begun to make inner-city neighborhoods popular targets for <br />such development. <br /> Many communities see theaters as catalysts for new <br />commercial development, reviving desolate inner-city areas. <br />Following this premise, the city of Chicago helped acquire the <br />land and offered financial support to Inner City Entertainment, <br />whose theaters are located in neighborhoods that have suffered a <br />steady decline of commercial activity. Inner City Entertainment <br />plans to hire primarily from the neighborhood and to offer <br />welfare-to-work programs. Christopher Burke <br /> <br /> <br />