Laserfiche WebLink
II. <br /> <br />What is the official local status of the plan amendment? (Check all that apply.) If <br />a report regarding this plan revision was prepared for the local Planning <br />Commission or City Council please include one (1) copy of that report along with <br />the submittal package. <br /> <br />__ Acted upon by planning commission (if applicable) on <br /> <br />__ Approved by governing body, contingent upon Metropolitan Council <br />review. . <br /> <br />__ Considered, but not approved, by governing body on <br /> <br />Other <br /> <br />List adjacent local governmental units and other jurisdictions (school districts, <br />watershed districts, etc.) to which copies of the plan revision or amendment have <br />been sent, and the date the copies were sent to them. (Required by Minn. Stat. <br />473.858, Subd. 2.) .None. <br /> <br />CONFORMITY WITH METROPOLITAN SYSTEM PLANS <br /> <br />Transportation <br />Does this plan revision or amendment potentially increase existing trip generation <br />(use Institute of Transportation Engineers trip-generation manual)? <br /> <br />X <br /> <br />__ No... if no, Skip to #5 <br /> Yes... if yes, <br /> · What is the estimated average daily traffic increase? 916 upd <br /> · What is the estimated peak hour traffic increase? 92 uph <br /> <br />Does the existing local and regional road network (including metropolitan <br />interchanges) have the capacity to accommodate planned land use(s)? <br /> X Yes <br /> No... <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Does this plan amendment impact transit service or facilities--either positively or <br />negatively? <br /> X No <br /> __ Yes... briefly explain <br /> <br />Can the potential traffic impacts of the land use be mitigated by implementing <br />Traffic Demand Management (TDM) strategies or through land use and urban <br />design measures that encourage alternatives to single occupancy vehicles (SOV)? <br /> X No <br /> <br />III <br /> <br /> <br />