Laserfiche WebLink
Resources on Industrial Ecology <br /> <br /> Cairncross, Frances. Green, Inc.: .4 Guide to Business a,d the <br /> Envi~vnme,t. Washington D.C.: Island Press, 1995. <br /> Center for Neighborhood Technology. CNT Web Site. Chicago: <br /> Center for Neighborhood Technology (www. cnt. org). Last <br /> accessed 5/28/98. (Contains information on sustainable <br /> manufacturing.) <br /> Cornell University. Work and Environment Initiative Web Site <br /> ( www. cfe. cornell, edtdWEI/EID, html), kast accessed 5/28/98. <br /> Hawken, Paul. The Ecology of Commerce: A Declaration of <br /> Sustainabili(y. New York: HarperCollins, 1993. <br /> President's Council on Sustainable Development, President's <br /> Council on Sustainable Development Web Site. Washington, <br /> D.C.: Executive Office of the President of the United States <br /> (www2. whitehouse.gov/WH/EOP/pcsd/index-plain.htmi). Last <br /> accessed 5/28/98. <br /> Schley, Sara, and Joseph Laur. Creating Sustainable Organizatiom: <br /> Meeting the Economic, Ecological, .and Social Challenges of the 2lst <br /> Century. Innovations in Management Series. 1998. Waltham, <br /> Mass.: Pegasus Communications, Inc. <br /> Socolow, R., C. Andrews, F. Berkhout, and V. Thomas, eds. <br /> Industrial Ecology and Global Change. 1994. Cambridge, <br /> England: Cambridge University Press. <br /> Van der Ryn, Sim, and Stuart Cowan. Ecological Design. <br /> Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1996. <br /> Wann, David. Deep Design: Pathways to a Livable Future. <br /> Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1996. <br /> <br /> surgically precise manufacturing methods with minimal <br /> negative environmental impacts. Environmental sophistication <br /> can, however, lead one back to basic principles, and industrial <br /> firms are also learning to pay close attention to many relatively <br /> simple measures that yield big savings by reusing or recycling <br /> waste to reduce disposal costs. Companies like 3M Corporation <br /> have used incentives to reward employees both for new product <br /> ideas and for those that reduce waste. <br /> Computer technology has served as a powerful catalyst in <br />this trend because competitive advantage depends increasingly <br />on the successful management of ideas and information systems. <br />In this new environment, thc most adaptable thinkers tap into <br />the science of systems analysis. For those investigating <br />sustainable methods of industrial development, the system <br />under study is nature itself. The idea is to replicate nature's <br />closed loop in which waste literally does not exist because some <br />organism will always make use of the waste that another <br />produces. The idea behind ecological industrial design is, to the <br />maximum extent feasible, to mimic natural systems by <br />eliminating both extractive raw material inputs and disposal <br />COSTS. <br /> A chief target in many cases is the use of nonrenewable fuel <br />sources. For example, as part of the sustainable redesign of <br />Soldiers Grove, Wisconsin, following the town's 1978 <br />relocation from the Kickapoo River floodplain, one IGA grocery <br />store installed a solar heating system so efficient that, even in <br />that northern climate, it was nine years before the store had to <br />use its backup gas heating system, <br /> <br />Service wlth a Smile <br />The firms making the most thorough commitment to industrial <br />ecology, however, look at more than just one input here and <br />another output there. They seek to reinvent their business from <br />the ground up, examining everything they do as part of an <br />overall, ougoing environmental audit. This usually leads to <br />rethinking their enterprise not as one that sells products bt, t as <br />one providing a service. <br /> <br /> For instance, Interface Carpet Company, one of the largest <br />carpet manu£qcmrers in the world, undertook such a self-evaluation <br />after founder and CEO Ray Anderson decided to examine the <br />company's environmental track record during a business <br />downswing in 1994. The process he turned loose among his 6,000 <br />employees led to the conclusion that Interface's real product was <br />not carpets, but the comfort and service that they provide. This led <br />to the notion that Interface should retain ownership of the <br />materials used in the manufacture of its carpets, allowing customers <br />to lease ca?pet tiles that could be returned for new ones. Old tiles <br />are reconditioned and recycled for use by other customers, rather <br />than being sent to landfills. <br /> The result for Interface has been a dramatic combination of <br />improved environmental performance, a better public image, and <br />renewed profitability, some of the latter traceable to customers <br />that have a more positive image of the company because of its <br />innovations. Interface reported $45 million in savings by 1997, <br />accompanied by a 25 percent increase in revenues, now topping <br />$1 billion annually, and a doubling in stock price. <br /> This change in the sense of corporate mission can <br />challenge deeply rooted assumptions. Karl-Henrik Robart, <br />the Swedish founder of The Natural Step, an international <br />group that conducts sustainability training sessions for <br />corporations, reports that the CEO of McDonald's Sweden <br />asked, "In a sustainable society, do we really need <br />hamburgers?" The implication was that the real mission was <br />not to sell hamburgers but to provide high-quality fast food <br />at a low cost. McDonald's, however, cannot change solely on <br />its own. The question presupposes that in the future the <br />firm's customers may take a different view of their own <br />dietary preferences in relation to concepts of sustainable <br />agriculture. It is a marketing dilemma any retailer faces. The <br />hamburger chain likely cannot survive such a change in <br />mission unless its customers also embrace the idea. <br /> <br />Strategic Partnerships <br />One of the leading concepts in modern business, notes Peter <br />Lowitt, director of planning and economic development for the <br />town of Londonderry, New Hampshire, is that of strategic <br />partnerships. Rather than trying to maintain a large corporate <br />structure that does many things well, corporations focus their <br />energies on a few products and services in which they excel and <br />contract with others who can provide other needed inputs or <br />services more efficiently. No firm is an island; each swims in a <br />sea ofsymbiotlc relationships with other companies, becoming <br />more competitive in part by becoming more cooperative and by <br />choosing its partners well, <br /> That, says Lowitt, is precisely the concept behind an eco- <br />industrial park (EIP), a special type of industrial park in which <br />tenants seek to minimize or eliminate their wastes and other <br />environmental impacts through symbiotic arrangements with <br />other firms so that no net waste leaves the park. Instead, one <br />firm's waste is always someone else's feedstock in a strategic web <br />of alliances that makes everyone, including the host community, <br />better offeconomically, socially, and environmentally. <br /> Londonderry is working on the development of just such an <br />EIP now. So are Northampton County, Virginia, which <br />occupies the long, narrow peninsula across the Chesapeake Bay <br />from Norfolk, and other communities across the nation, such as <br />Baltimore; Chattanooga, Tennessee; and Brownsville, Texas. <br />Many of these are treated in case studies being developed by the <br />Corn¢ll Work and Environment Initiative (WEI) at Cornell <br />University (see "Resources" above). <br /> <br /> <br />