|
Resources on Industrial Ecology
<br />
<br /> Cairncross, Frances. Green, Inc.: .4 Guide to Business a,d the
<br /> Envi~vnme,t. Washington D.C.: Island Press, 1995.
<br /> Center for Neighborhood Technology. CNT Web Site. Chicago:
<br /> Center for Neighborhood Technology (www. cnt. org). Last
<br /> accessed 5/28/98. (Contains information on sustainable
<br /> manufacturing.)
<br /> Cornell University. Work and Environment Initiative Web Site
<br /> ( www. cfe. cornell, edtdWEI/EID, html), kast accessed 5/28/98.
<br /> Hawken, Paul. The Ecology of Commerce: A Declaration of
<br /> Sustainabili(y. New York: HarperCollins, 1993.
<br /> President's Council on Sustainable Development, President's
<br /> Council on Sustainable Development Web Site. Washington,
<br /> D.C.: Executive Office of the President of the United States
<br /> (www2. whitehouse.gov/WH/EOP/pcsd/index-plain.htmi). Last
<br /> accessed 5/28/98.
<br /> Schley, Sara, and Joseph Laur. Creating Sustainable Organizatiom:
<br /> Meeting the Economic, Ecological, .and Social Challenges of the 2lst
<br /> Century. Innovations in Management Series. 1998. Waltham,
<br /> Mass.: Pegasus Communications, Inc.
<br /> Socolow, R., C. Andrews, F. Berkhout, and V. Thomas, eds.
<br /> Industrial Ecology and Global Change. 1994. Cambridge,
<br /> England: Cambridge University Press.
<br /> Van der Ryn, Sim, and Stuart Cowan. Ecological Design.
<br /> Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1996.
<br /> Wann, David. Deep Design: Pathways to a Livable Future.
<br /> Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1996.
<br />
<br /> surgically precise manufacturing methods with minimal
<br /> negative environmental impacts. Environmental sophistication
<br /> can, however, lead one back to basic principles, and industrial
<br /> firms are also learning to pay close attention to many relatively
<br /> simple measures that yield big savings by reusing or recycling
<br /> waste to reduce disposal costs. Companies like 3M Corporation
<br /> have used incentives to reward employees both for new product
<br /> ideas and for those that reduce waste.
<br /> Computer technology has served as a powerful catalyst in
<br />this trend because competitive advantage depends increasingly
<br />on the successful management of ideas and information systems.
<br />In this new environment, thc most adaptable thinkers tap into
<br />the science of systems analysis. For those investigating
<br />sustainable methods of industrial development, the system
<br />under study is nature itself. The idea is to replicate nature's
<br />closed loop in which waste literally does not exist because some
<br />organism will always make use of the waste that another
<br />produces. The idea behind ecological industrial design is, to the
<br />maximum extent feasible, to mimic natural systems by
<br />eliminating both extractive raw material inputs and disposal
<br />COSTS.
<br /> A chief target in many cases is the use of nonrenewable fuel
<br />sources. For example, as part of the sustainable redesign of
<br />Soldiers Grove, Wisconsin, following the town's 1978
<br />relocation from the Kickapoo River floodplain, one IGA grocery
<br />store installed a solar heating system so efficient that, even in
<br />that northern climate, it was nine years before the store had to
<br />use its backup gas heating system,
<br />
<br />Service wlth a Smile
<br />The firms making the most thorough commitment to industrial
<br />ecology, however, look at more than just one input here and
<br />another output there. They seek to reinvent their business from
<br />the ground up, examining everything they do as part of an
<br />overall, ougoing environmental audit. This usually leads to
<br />rethinking their enterprise not as one that sells products bt, t as
<br />one providing a service.
<br />
<br /> For instance, Interface Carpet Company, one of the largest
<br />carpet manu£qcmrers in the world, undertook such a self-evaluation
<br />after founder and CEO Ray Anderson decided to examine the
<br />company's environmental track record during a business
<br />downswing in 1994. The process he turned loose among his 6,000
<br />employees led to the conclusion that Interface's real product was
<br />not carpets, but the comfort and service that they provide. This led
<br />to the notion that Interface should retain ownership of the
<br />materials used in the manufacture of its carpets, allowing customers
<br />to lease ca?pet tiles that could be returned for new ones. Old tiles
<br />are reconditioned and recycled for use by other customers, rather
<br />than being sent to landfills.
<br /> The result for Interface has been a dramatic combination of
<br />improved environmental performance, a better public image, and
<br />renewed profitability, some of the latter traceable to customers
<br />that have a more positive image of the company because of its
<br />innovations. Interface reported $45 million in savings by 1997,
<br />accompanied by a 25 percent increase in revenues, now topping
<br />$1 billion annually, and a doubling in stock price.
<br /> This change in the sense of corporate mission can
<br />challenge deeply rooted assumptions. Karl-Henrik Robart,
<br />the Swedish founder of The Natural Step, an international
<br />group that conducts sustainability training sessions for
<br />corporations, reports that the CEO of McDonald's Sweden
<br />asked, "In a sustainable society, do we really need
<br />hamburgers?" The implication was that the real mission was
<br />not to sell hamburgers but to provide high-quality fast food
<br />at a low cost. McDonald's, however, cannot change solely on
<br />its own. The question presupposes that in the future the
<br />firm's customers may take a different view of their own
<br />dietary preferences in relation to concepts of sustainable
<br />agriculture. It is a marketing dilemma any retailer faces. The
<br />hamburger chain likely cannot survive such a change in
<br />mission unless its customers also embrace the idea.
<br />
<br />Strategic Partnerships
<br />One of the leading concepts in modern business, notes Peter
<br />Lowitt, director of planning and economic development for the
<br />town of Londonderry, New Hampshire, is that of strategic
<br />partnerships. Rather than trying to maintain a large corporate
<br />structure that does many things well, corporations focus their
<br />energies on a few products and services in which they excel and
<br />contract with others who can provide other needed inputs or
<br />services more efficiently. No firm is an island; each swims in a
<br />sea ofsymbiotlc relationships with other companies, becoming
<br />more competitive in part by becoming more cooperative and by
<br />choosing its partners well,
<br /> That, says Lowitt, is precisely the concept behind an eco-
<br />industrial park (EIP), a special type of industrial park in which
<br />tenants seek to minimize or eliminate their wastes and other
<br />environmental impacts through symbiotic arrangements with
<br />other firms so that no net waste leaves the park. Instead, one
<br />firm's waste is always someone else's feedstock in a strategic web
<br />of alliances that makes everyone, including the host community,
<br />better offeconomically, socially, and environmentally.
<br /> Londonderry is working on the development of just such an
<br />EIP now. So are Northampton County, Virginia, which
<br />occupies the long, narrow peninsula across the Chesapeake Bay
<br />from Norfolk, and other communities across the nation, such as
<br />Baltimore; Chattanooga, Tennessee; and Brownsville, Texas.
<br />Many of these are treated in case studies being developed by the
<br />Corn¢ll Work and Environment Initiative (WEI) at Cornell
<br />University (see "Resources" above).
<br />
<br />
<br />
|