Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/04/1998

Home

I ! I I I I I I I I I I o 10. I1. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. That the Applicants have been residing in the City of Blaine for the past 9 years and upon inquiry, a Code Enforcment Officer at the City of Blaine verified that there are no complaints on record regarding the Applicants show dog kennel operations at their Blaine address, but that they were in violation of City Code which restricts the maximum number of dogs to3 in a residential zone with urban services. That the Applicants are seeking permission to maintain a maximum of 15 dogs on the property in order to facilitate 4 or 5 breeding adult dogs (over 3 months of age by City of Ramsey definition) and one or two litters per year which produce approximately 3-4 puppies per litter, that are offered for sale at 8 weeks of age. That the Applicant's application includes a Preliminary Fencing Plan dated 7/20/98 identifying the use of fenced yards and kennels for maintenance of the dogs while they are outdoors. That the Applicant has stated that the dogs are kept indoors at night. That there are other similar conditional uses in the City. That the proposed use will/will not adversely impact traffic in the area.. That the proposed use will/will not be unduly dangerous or otherwise detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. That the proposed use will/will not substantially adversely impair the use, enjoyment, or market value of any surrounding property. That the proposed use will/will not be hazardous to existing or future neighboring uses. That the proposed use will/will not be served adequately by public facilities and services such as highways and streets. That the proposed use will/will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services, and it will/will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. That the proposed use will/will not involve activities and uses that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. The motion for the adoption of/he foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: RESOLUTION//98-06-133 Page 2 of 3