Laserfiche WebLink
Board Member introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #98-06- <br /> <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT AN <br />ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NEARER THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE THAN THE <br />PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE AND DECLARING 'I~]ZR1VIS OF SAME <br /> <br /> WIIEREAS, Richa-d Iv~itchell (Permittee) has properly applied for a variance from <br />Section 9.11.02 of the Ramsey City Code to construct an accessory structure nearer the front <br />property line than the principal structure on the property generally known as 6415 172nd Lane <br />NW and legally described as follows: <br /> <br />Lot 4, Block 1, Trott Brook Estates, Anoka County, Minnesota <br />("Subject Property") <br /> <br /> AND WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment conducted a public heating on June 2, 1998, <br />pursuant to Section 9.03.05 of the Ramsey City Code. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE <br />CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as foIIows: <br /> <br />1. That based on Findings of Fact # .; a variance to construct an accessory structure nearer <br /> the front property line than the principal structure on the Subject Property is hereby granted. <br /> <br />2. That the accessory garage constructed on the subject property shall not be located any closer <br /> than 85 feet from the nearest point of the front property line on the Subject Property. <br /> <br />3. That the Permittees shall obtain all necessary permits prior to commencing any construction <br /> of the accessory structure. <br /> <br />That the accessory structure shall be used for storage of equipment and vehicles in <br />accordance with City Code and no business activity shall be permitted within said structure, <br />unless it is done in accordance with City Code. <br /> <br />5. That the Permittees and/or property owners shall be responsible for all City costs incurred in <br /> administering and enforcing this variance. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Board Member <br /> , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br /> <br />