My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/11/1997
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1997
>
Agenda - Council - 02/11/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 4:13:34 PM
Creation date
9/18/2003 3:04:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/11/1997
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
! <br />I STREET CLOSURE <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />TYPE <br /> <br />TYPE Z <br /> <br /> A street closure, for the purpose of the <br /> Residential Neighborhood Traffic Control <br /> Tool Box, is defined as closing a street either <br /> at one end or the other, or at a mid-block <br /> location. The purpose is to eliminate <br /> wanted through traffic. <br /> <br /> Street closing is a fairly common traffic con- <br /> trol technique. It is we//documented/_n the <br /> "Residential Street Design & Traffic Control" <br /> published by Prentice Hail (1989). There are <br /> two basic types of closure to consider. Type 1 <br /> is defined as being near to the main street. <br /> The closed street can no longer gain access to <br /> or from the main s~eet. Type 2 is defined as <br /> being a far closure. The closed street can only <br />."ga. in' access to the main street. Type 1 is most <br /> effective at reducing through traffic volumes. <br /> <br /> Effects <br />Volumes. The impact on traffic volume is <br />drastic, reducing traffic volume to that which <br />is generated by the land use on the abutti.ng <br />properties. To be most effective/the closure <br />must be visible to the drivers, so that the <br />driver does not run onto the street and then <br />finds it to be a dead-end. A "dead-end" sign <br />may be needed. Sufficient capacity on the <br />alternative route is also needed. <br /> <br /> Speed. Again, the impact is drastic, reducing <br /> the speed to that normally associated with <br /> short dead-end residential streets. <br /> <br /> Traffic Noise, Air Quality and Energy Con- <br /> sumptiom There should be a dramatic <br /> reduction in noise directly related to the <br /> reduction in traffic volumes. This is also <br /> complished w/th an increase in air quality. <br /> <br /> Energy Consuznption. No change in energy <br /> consumption is expected since vehicle trips <br /> are not eliminated, but merely rerouted to <br /> main streets. <br /> <br />Traffic Safety. There is a substantial increase <br />in traffic safety. The neighborhood abutting <br />the closed street has less traffic and the traffic <br />that remains ks all local, usually welt known <br />amongst themselves. There is also a safety <br />improvement to the main street. Traffic <br />entering or exiting the main street is <br />e//minated at the dose. d street and relocated <br />at adjacent intersection with better .traffic con- <br />trol. This portion of traffic safety has been the <br />driving force in the majority of street closures <br />described in the case study section. <br /> <br />Community Reaction. Reaction from people <br />who live on the street is usually very positive. <br />It is important to have aH the residents in- <br /> 141 <br /> <br />Neighborhood Traffic Control January 1994 20-1 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.