My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/11/1997
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1997
>
Agenda - Council - 02/11/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 4:13:34 PM
Creation date
9/18/2003 3:04:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/11/1997
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tribune and/or the Pioneer Press as well. An additional option is to advertise in trade <br />journals if time permits. <br /> <br />7. Receive Applications <br />We keep a database of the name and address of each person who requests an application <br />packet. We also note which people actually remm the packet. <br /> <br />8. Score and Rank Applications; Select First Interview Candidates <br />A rating sheet is completed for each application. Scores on each application are <br />compared and discussed if they vary, which doesn't happen often because the criteria are <br />pretty clear cut. We attach all rating sheets to the application in case there are questions <br />later. <br /> <br />Sometimes there is a natural cutoff point, i.e., a cluster of nine candidates in the 90's and <br />then a gap until the low 80's; we would invite those nine for a first interview. If there is <br />no natural separation, we might decide in advance to interview the ten top five to ten <br />ranked applicants. <br /> <br />9. Notify Unqualified Applicants <br />Anyone who does not meet the minimum qualifications is immediately sent a <br />personalized letter thanking them for their application and explaining that they are not <br />being considered further. A copy of the "rejection" letter is attached to the application. <br /> <br />10. Conduct First Interviews <br />Members of the imerview panel take turns asking the pre-established questions and make <br />notes about the responses. After all interviews are completed, panel members compare <br />notes and rank the applicants. The top three to five are selected for second interviews. <br /> <br />11. Conduct Second Interviews <br />At this point the appropriate department head may join the interview panel. Applicants <br />who make it to the second interview have the required technical abilities. The second <br />interview helps us determine if they would be a good fit with the organization. Questions <br />are in the form of scenarios that an employee in the position would likely experience. <br />After ail interviews are completed, candidates are ranked. If there two top candidates <br />rank equally, the interview panel may make the final selection based on factors such as <br />who best fits within the organization. <br /> <br />For department head positions, we have assembled "expert panels" of people in similar <br />positions in other cities to conduct an additional interview of candidates and make a <br />recommendation. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />12. Check References <br />We notify the top candidate that he or she is a finalist and that we will be checking <br />references. We keep any notes on information received during the reference checks. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.