My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/11/1997
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1997
>
Agenda - Council - 03/11/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 4:14:04 PM
Creation date
9/19/2003 9:21:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/11/1997
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />0~/07/~7 <br /> <br />OFFICES 2140 <br /> <br />Minn, Stat. § 471.'/0S, su~. I. <br /> <br />Mina, Stat § 412.151, gubd. I. <br /> <br />Metro 500, Ina, v, City of Brooidy. <br />Part~ 2'/9 Mina. 294, 2! I N.W.20 238 <br />0973): Inlat~d Constr. Co. v. City of <br />Bloomington, 292 Minn. 379, 195 <br />N,W.2d 58S (1972). <br /> <br />4TH RUE * 612 427 5545 NU.44~ ~4 <br /> <br />* The names of the councBmembers and the mayor who voled <br /> either for or against each motion. <br /> <br />Ordinance. s, resolutions and claims considered by the city council do <br />not need to be fully detailed in the minutes if they appear in other <br />perrmment records kept by the clerk and can be accurately identified <br />by the description given in the minutes. <br /> <br />Making an adequate record <br /> <br /> It is very important to make an adequate record of council decisions <br /> and the factual information that members based their decisions on. <br />, Minutes are the primary record of the decision-making process and <br />axe ~titieal if council actions become subject to judicial review. <br /> <br />Council actions are classified as either legislative or administrative in <br />nature. The establishment of general policies and procedures is <br />legislative and is subject to limited judicial review. Courts typically <br />will not substitute their judgement for a council's judgemenL <br /> <br />Administrative or quasi-judicial actions involve the application of a <br />general policy to a speci.fic person or situation. Administrative <br />actions are subject to greater judicial scrutiny and will be set aside if <br />axbitrary, unxeasonabb or capricious. Therefore, it is important for <br />the council to develop an accurate record and findings. <br /> <br />For example: in order for a court to meaningfully review council <br />actions, the minutes must clearly and precisely state the council's <br />finding of facts and how those facts led m the council's decision. <br />Findings of fact serve not only to improve the decision-making <br />process, but aid in judicial review. The findings are part of the <br />record. When a court reviews council proceedings, they wiLl rely on <br />the records the city kept, not on the records it might have <br />maintained. <br /> <br />Parts of the record <br /> <br />· When thc city council or other governing body holds a hearing, the <br />record usually consists of two separate parts: the transcript, which <br />preserves testimony, and the final order or determination. Following <br />is a sample final order outline for a special use permit. The elements <br />of the order reflect the steps taken by a hearing body in arriving at a <br />decision. <br /> <br />* A caption or title, such as, "In thc matter of Ms. X's application <br /> for a special use permit"; <br /> <br />163 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.