Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />City of Ramsey <br /> <br />15153 NOWTHEN BOULEVARD N.W., RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303 <br /> <br />PHONE (612) 427-1410 FAX (612) 427-5543 <br /> TDD (612) 427-8591 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />February 27, 1997 <br /> <br />John Lamoureux <br />G.M. Homes, Inc. <br />15025 Glazier Avenue, #205 <br />Apple Valley, Mn 55124 <br /> <br />Re: Site Plan Review: Sunfish Lake Ponds <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Lamoureux: <br /> <br />We are in receipt of your site plan to develop a townhome plat on Ouflot B, Sunfish Square, in <br />Ramsey. The site plan package consists of Sheets 2, 3, 4 and 5 of 5 prepared by Pioneer <br />Engineering: We are also in receipt of a 6 sheet set of sumcture elevations and floor plans prepared <br />by KLF Design dated December 26, 1996. We offer the following comments: <br /> <br />General: The subject property is approximately 9.2 acres in size and the development <br />proposal is for 81 townhouse units. <br /> <br />Zoning: The subject property is zoned Multiple Residential (MR) for which multifamily <br />housing up to 15 units per acre is a permitted use; the text on the preliminary plat should be <br />corrected accordingly. The MR regulations in City Code seem to imply that a multifamily <br />development exceeding 3 dwelling units per structure requires a rezoning to Planned Unit <br />Development. A rezoning to P.U.D. to achieve approval for a use that is already <br />established as a permitted use in its zone is not logical. The City Attorney has determ/ned <br />that the intent of the language is to not require a rezoning but rather a requirement to follow <br />the performance standards and intent of the City's PUD code section. <br /> <br />Streets and Access: Access to the plat is proposed to be provided from 142nd Lane on the <br />north and 141st Lane on the east. All streets within the boundaries of the plat will be <br />constructed and maintained as private streets. The Street Profile reflects that the pavement <br />width will be 28 feet on the main spine street and 20 to 24 feet on the fe. eder drives. Staff <br />recommends making the minimum pav&ment width 24 feet between the faces of the <br />concrete curbing and posting 'no parking' signs along the spine street to ensure continuous <br />free access by emergency vehicles. The Prelim/nary Site and Utility Plan identifies that the <br />street pavement will be finished with a mountable concrete curb and gutter. This is <br />acceptable to City Staff. <br /> <br />Setbacks: At the time of sketch plan review, City Staff called for a 35 foot structure <br />setback from adjacent single family residential property lines. The struc'mre on Lot 11 is 50 <br />feet from the nearest single family residential property Iine; ali of the remaining structures <br />greatly exceed the 35 foot requirement. The structure setback from County Roads #57 and <br />#116 is 60 feet from the center of the right-of-way plus the local applicable setback. In this <br />case, the locable appticable setback is the side yard setback which is 10 feet. Therefore, the <br />structures must be at least 70 feet from the center of the right-of-way. All of the structures <br />greatly exceed this setback requirement also. <br /> <br /> <br />