Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CASE <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF APPLE RIDGE; <br />CASE OF GOOD VALUE HOMES <br /> By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />The City has received a request for preliminary plat approval of Apple Ridge from Good Value <br />Homes. The property is located west of T.H. #47 at about 157th and 158th. The following items <br />are enclosed: <br /> <br /> 1. Site location map <br />2. Preliminary Plat and Utility Plan with a revision date of 6/2/97; Grading Plan with an <br /> assumed revision date of 6/2/97; and a tree preservation plan <br />3. City Staff Review Letter dated March 26, 1997 <br />4. Ltr from Mn/DOT dated April 17, 1997 <br />5. Planning Commission, Park Commission and City Council meeting minutes dated <br /> February 4, February 25, March 4, March 13, March 25, April 1, April 7 <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />The Planning Commission conducted the public hearing on April 1 and continued the regular <br />meeting to April 7. On April 7 the Planning Commission recommended preliminary plat <br />approval contingent upon approval of the rezoning to R-I Urban Residential. <br /> <br />In response to direction given at the April 22, 1997 Council meeting, the City Attorney reported <br />to Council on May 27 that the determination of the approved MUSA boundary in the vicinity of <br />Apple Ridge does not include the northeast 6.2 acres of that proposed subdivision. Therefore, <br />the total acreage permitted for development at urban standards is 57.8. Accordingly, the <br />developer has revised the preliminary plat to exclude that area determined not to be in the MUSA <br />and consequently the number of lots has been reduced from the 142 approved by the Planning <br />Commission to 127. The revised preliminary plat simply eliminates the area not included in the <br />MUSA and involves no other plat design change from that which was reviewed and approved by <br />the Planning Commission. Therefore, it has been determined that the reduction in the area to be <br />platted is not a significant change to the plat and does not warrant another public hearing at the <br />Planning Commission level. <br /> <br />The ratio of rural to urban lots on the west property boundary is 1 to 1. The ratio of urban to <br />rural lots on the western 2/3 of the north plat boundary is less than 1.5 to 1 and there are 3.5 lots <br />that back up to the larger rural parcel abutting the eastern 1/3 of the north plat boundary. <br /> <br />City Code establishes a minimum lot size of 10,800 square feet and inclusive of streets, you can <br />generally achieve a density of 3 units per acre. The average lot size in the revised preliminary <br />plat is 15,828 square feet with a density of 2.2 units per acre. The average lot size on those lots <br />abutting the rural development to the west and north is 22,336 square feet. The lot widths on the <br />west plat boundary are the same as the adjacent rural lots. <br /> <br /> <br />