Laserfiche WebLink
! <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Deemer, to amend Condition No. 9 to require the contractor to clean <br />County Road 63 of debris and dirt as needed. <br /> <br />Discussion: Commissioner Holland asked the distance length thai would have to be cleaned. <br />Chairperson Bawden stated that the amended language is too vague. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski suggested amending the motion to state that the contractor shall remove <br />accumulations fi-om the roadway as directed by the City Engineer, even though in his opinion he <br />believes this matter is the County's responsibility. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer stated that if road cleanup is not under City authority, he would not vote <br />for the amendment. <br /> <br />Chairperson Bawden stated that the same language should be used for the hauling permit on <br />County Road 57. <br /> <br />The motion was not seconded and did not carry. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner LaDue, seconded by Commissioner Deemer to add County Road 5 and <br />T.H. 47 to be cleaned on a daily basis. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawder~ Commissioners LaDue, Deemer, Holland, <br />Jensen, Terry, and Thorud. Voting no: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Deemer, seconded by Commissioner Holland to amend Condition No. 9 <br />to require the contractor to clean County Road 63, County Road 5 and T.H. 47 of debris and dirt <br />on a daily basis. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Deemer, Holland, Jensen, <br />LaDue, Terry, and Thom& Voting no: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Deemer, seconded by Commissioner Terry to recommend approval of <br />the amended conditions of the Conditional Use Permit. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Deemer, Terry, Holland, <br />Jensen, LaDue, and Thorud. Voting no: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />~//Case #2: <br /> <br />Request for Sketch Plan Approval of Apple Ridge; Case of Good Value <br />Homes <br /> <br />Zoning Administrator Frolik reported submittal of a sketch plan for approval fi-om Mr. John <br />Peterson representing Good Value Homes. The plat consists of approximately 60 acres located <br />within MUSA and eligible for development of 180 lots. The proposal is to develop 147 lots. At <br />the time of the preliminary plat approval, the City will verify compliance with ail code <br />requirements. The Park Commission will review the plan to determine the park dedication at their <br /> <br />Planning Commission/February 4, 1997 <br /> Page 5 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />