My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/08/1997
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1997
>
Agenda - Council - 07/08/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 4:17:23 PM
Creation date
9/22/2003 10:04:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/08/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The LMC/CEAM Model has removed the concept of a general bond and instead <br />contemplates recovering all costs including restoration costs via the permit fee. This <br />provides the City with less security and makes setting the permit fee at the proper <br />amount critically important. Therefore, B&L believes that a bond is warranted. <br /> <br />Both ordinances allow providers to elect not to perform restoration and both allow the <br />providers to require the City to perform such restoration. This result is mandated by <br />the new law. <br /> <br />However, the new law also provides the City with a right to mandate that the City <br />retain the right to perform all restoration regardless of the providers' election. The <br />B&L Model incorporates this authority while the LMC/CEAM Model does not. <br /> <br />Both ordinances contemplate that if a provider elects not to perform restoration itself, <br />and the City similarly opts not to perform such restoration, the City may require <br />payment of a degradation fee. Such fee is permitted by law. Both ordinances clarify <br />that payment of a degradation fee does not relieve the provider from any obligation to <br />perform restoration. <br /> <br />However, the B&L Model clarifies that the degradation fee must include a component <br />to cover the costs of future restoration to allow the City to perform the same should the <br />provider fail to do so. <br /> <br />The B&L Model contains a specific provision regarding appeals from permit denials <br />and revocations and registration denials, all in accordance with the new state law. The <br />LMC/CEAM Model does not contain such a provision. <br /> <br />Attached to the B&L Model are examples of forms which the City may wish to use to <br />implement the ordinance. These forms may be modified as the City sees fit or used in <br />the. k p. resent form. <br /> <br />coNCLusION <br /> <br />Both the B&L Model and the LMC/CEAM Model are consistent with the new state legislation <br />and both are acceptable for adoption by your municipality. In some respects, the B&L Model <br />and the LMC/CEAM ModeI reflect different policy choices. The City should undertake an <br />aggressive discussion of such policy issues leading to the adoption of an ordinance. Please <br />feel free to contact this office with questions about either model. <br /> <br />C:\VOSEkB&L-LMC.M01 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.