My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/14/1997
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1997
>
Agenda - Council - 10/14/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 4:22:03 PM
Creation date
9/22/2003 2:56:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/14/1997
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
342
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE <br /> <br />AUTHORIZE AGREEMENT WITH SPRINGSTED, INC. TO PERFORM TIF <br />COMPLIANCE AUDIT <br /> By: Jessie Hart, Finance Officer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />As you are aware the City of Ramsey has been involved in the use of tax increment financing <br />[TIF] within the City for several years. This use of TIF has afforded the City the opportunity to <br />expand its tax base [both residential and commercial] and entice quality businesses to the City. <br /> <br />The City currently has two Development Districts which incorporate six tax increment financing <br />districts. Under the law, pooling of funds within a development district has always been allowed <br />and the reporting to the State had always been required by development district. The 1995 <br />legislature, in an attempt to ensure that TIF funds were not being misused, implemented very <br />stringent reporting guidelines for the 1995 year-end reporting forms. These guidelines required <br />that each TIF district be reported separately. This requirement was retroactive to the inception of <br />each district. <br /> <br />The 1995 reports were filed with the State in mid-July of 1996. At that time it was noted to the <br />State TIF Department that there were some inadequacies in the accounting information from the <br />early years [apparent computer system malfunctions and retention of records] and that the <br />changes in categories for reporting purposes had caused what appeared to be discrepancies from <br />the budgeted amounts. This same note was made with the 1996 reports when they were filed <br />earlier this year. <br /> <br />While I am comfortable that we are in compliance under legal standards, there is concern that the <br />budgets within each district need to modified with the inception of each new development <br />agreement or at least once each year o which I don't believe has been done. There has also been <br />concern expressed as to the need for "more" detail as it pertains to each distr/ct. On that same <br />note, the changes in this last legislative session have potential negative impacts on each district <br />as it pertains to future increment collections and outstanding commitments. <br /> <br />The above information was shared with the auditors during the 1996 audit and based on that <br />discussion the auditors issued a comment in their annual management report suggesting that we <br />contract with an outside agency to complete a compliance audit on all of our districts [Exhibit <br />Al. <br /> <br />In discussions with the staff at the State, it was suggested that we utilize a fiscal agent that is <br />familiar with the City and its TIF activity. The fiscal agent that we have used on a consistent <br />basis is Springsted, Inc. They have been involved in our TIF related bond sales as well as <br />assisting in the preparation of cash flows for each district. They are also currently very active in <br />this type of compliance audit. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.