My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/14/1997
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1997
>
Agenda - Council - 10/14/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 4:22:03 PM
Creation date
9/22/2003 2:56:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/14/1997
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
342
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE <br /> <br />REVIEW REQUEST FOR DEFERRAL OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: <br />CASE OF ART RAUDIO <br /> By: Bill Goodrich, City Attorney and Jessie Hart, <br /> Finance Officer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Mr. Art Raudio approached the City Council at their regular meeting <br />on September 23, 1997 and presented a request to defer existing <br />levied assessments on two parcels adjacent to State Highway 47 near <br />the intersection with County Road 5. Mr. Raudio stated that he has <br />addressed this use in the past but no record of this request had <br />been found to verify this, although the conversations could have <br />taken place outside of a Council meeting and not documents. The <br />assessments were levied in conjunction with projects related to <br />several phases of the Rivers Bend additions (sewer and water <br />extensions and roadway improvements). <br /> <br />The parcels in question have a long history of changing PIN numbers <br />due to the development of the Rivers Bend addition. In 1988, <br />during one of the splits for Rivers Bend Third Addition, an error <br />at the County dropped $93,161.86 of assessments that should have <br />remained on the unimproved parcel (Amoco station development parcel <br />was paid). This error was discovered in early 1994 and, at the <br />County's direction and upon Council approval, was re-certified with <br />no penalty for the remainder of the life of the assessment (no <br />interest was charged for the time the assessment did not appear on <br />the County rolls). A copy of the resolution re-certifying the <br />assessments is attached. <br /> <br />Under state statutes the City has the ability to defer assessments <br />on undeveloped land for specified reasons. After some research, <br />and based on an Attorney Generals opinion on deferrals, the City <br />cannot defer an assessment after the first installment has been <br />paid. However, the City does have the ability to abate assessments <br />and re-certify with deferral stipulations. M.S. 429.071, subd. 2 <br />provides that in the event the Council finds that the assessment or <br />any part thereof is excessive, the Council may, upon notice and <br />hearing as provided for the original assessment, make a <br />reassessment or a new assessment as to such parcel or parcels. <br /> <br />The two properties, PIN #25-32-25-43-0059 and PIN #25-32-25-31-0005 <br />should really be addressed as two separate issues due to the tax <br />status of each. I will address each of them separately based on <br />conversations with Anoka County. <br /> <br />PIN ~25-32-25-31-0005 <br /> <br />The County has determined the market value of this property to be <br />$35,000.00. The annual principal amount of the assessments on this <br />property total $16,235.21 (does not include interest) and is <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.