Agenda - Council - 11/25/1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

' 13. That the Applicant has stated that the barn is in disrepair and will be repaired and reduced in size in order that the barn and proposed accessory building do not exceed the 2,464 ' square foot maximum accessory structure space allowed on the property. 14. That the Applicant has stated that the purpose of the accessory building is to house personal equipment and vehicles. 15. That the Applicant proposes to locate the accessory building approximately 83 feet from the front property line, which precludes the accessory building being located in a rural or urban front yard. ' 16. That the Applicant has a sufficient amount of frontage on 151 st Avenue to potentially subdivide the homestead and Subject Property into 4 urban residential lots if and when ' municipal services become available. 17. That the orientation of the proposed accessory building on the Subject Property and the ' location of the dwelling on the Applicant's homestead parcel may reduce the resubdivision potential of the parcels to urban standards from 4 lots to 3 lots. 18. That in its proposed location, the proposed accessory building cannot be used to house animals because it does not meet the 75 foot setback from property lines requirement. ' 19. That subsequent to the November 4 Planning Commission meeting, the Appicant made a decision to remove the existing barn from the property and apply for a variance to the required barn setback from property lines and residences in order to stable horses in the ' newly proposed accessory building. ' 20. That the proposed building will not adversely impact traffic in the area. 21. That the proposed building will not be unduly dangerous or otherwise detrimental to ' persons residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. 22. That the proposed building will not substantially adversely impair the use, enjoyment, or market value of any surrounding property. 23. That the proposed building will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future ' neighboring uses. 24. That the proposed building will be served adequately by public facilities and services such ' as highways and streets. ' 25. That the proposed buildings will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services, and it will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. RESOLUTION #9711- Page 3 of 4 ia*/