Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The result is that the city will have $750,000 of coverage limits available for most claims. But <br />on those claims to which the statutory limits apply, the city and LMCIT will be able to use the <br />statutory tort liability limit to limit an individual claimant's recovery to no more than $300,000. <br /> <br />Of course, there are some claims to which the statutory liability limits don't apply. A federal <br />civil right claim is one likely example. For these claims, there is no monetary limit on what the <br />individual claimant can recover from the city. On these claims, the city has $750,000 of <br />coverage limits available, regardless of whether it's one claimant or several. <br /> <br />The LMCIT Board decided to restructure the liability coverage in this way for two reasons: <br />First, it lets a city to take advantage of all of the defenses and protections that the legislature has <br />provided. Second, the projected savings from being able to apply the $300,000 per claimant <br />statutory limit will roughly offset the projected increased cost for the higher per-occurrence limit. <br /> <br />The city's option to waive the statutory limits <br /> <br />The statutory liability limit only comes into play if somebody has been injured by the city's <br />negligence, and has proved to the court that his/her actual injuries exceed $300,000. The <br />statutory liability limit means, very literally, that the city and LMCIT won't fully compensate that <br />individual for his/herinjuries which the city caused. Because of this, some cities may decide that <br />as a matter of public policy you want to have more than $300,000 available to compensate a <br />citizen who has been injured by the city's negligence. <br /> <br />For this reason, LMCIT gives the city the option to waive the statutory liability limit if the city <br />wishes to do so. By waiving the statutory limit, the city makes it possible for a claimant to <br />recover up to the full limit of the city's LMCIT liability coverage. Since it increases the loss <br />exposure, there is an additional cost if the city decides to waive the statutory limits. <br /> <br />If a city decides to waive the statutory liability limit and doesn't carry thc optional excess liability <br />coverage, the city's cOverage would essentially be identical to the current coverage but with a <br />higher limit. For cities that carry the optional excess liability coverage, the waiver also applies to <br />that coverage. <br /> <br /> T,.~The decision to waive or not to waive the statutory liability limits must be made by the city _-----. <br />~ The' package ~newai materials inclucles atorm that must be c0rhpleted~ci returned <br /> to LMCIT to document the council's decision on whether or not to waive the statutory limits. <br /> <br />Here's a shorthand summary of the practical effects of that decision: <br /> <br />If the city does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to <br />recover no more than $300,000 on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The <br />total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the <br />statutory tort limits apply would be limited to $750,000. These statutory tort limits would <br />apply regardless of whether or not the city purchases the optional excess liability coverage. <br /> <br /> <br />