My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/09/1997
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1997
>
Agenda - Council - 12/09/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 4:24:43 PM
Creation date
9/23/2003 8:53:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/09/1997
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />,I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />REVIEW AND ADOPT 1998 ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS <br /> By: Jessie L. Hart, Finance Officer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Enclosed for your review are the Proposed 1998 Enterprise Fund Budgets which cover the Water <br />Utility Fund, Sewer Utility Fund, Street Light Utility Fund and the Recycling Utility Fund. <br />While formal budgets are required to be prepared and adopted annually for the General Fund, <br />this is not the case for Enterprise funds. <br /> <br />In order to establish fair rates for all of the utilities that the City operates, it is necessary to <br />determine the actual cost of providing those utilities to the residents. Due to the relatively <br />"young age" of tho City's utility system, it is extremely difficult to immediately realize profits, <br />but it is important that any losses in the first years of operation be representative of what the <br />system actually costs. An important factor in these costs is the recovery of depreciation through <br />the rate structures. We are required to keep the accounting for these funds on the full accrual <br />method which moans recognizing total depreciation, whether on City or developer installed <br />systems. This is what we have attempted to do in preparing the attached Proposed 1998 <br />Enterprise Fund Budgets. <br /> <br />General Budget Information <br /> <br />Some assumptions, have been made that effect the manner in which we have prepared the <br />attached budgets. It was budgeted in the General Fund .that 100 ne~_~w resid&ntial homes would be <br />~e assump~lAg~}-woutd3~ ~b~a~ ._a_d~itjo~n_s~_t_h.he~r. efore, <br />this isthe number 'that was utilized in preparing th.e~tacl~d-budgets.~-Costs~that-~an be <br />~attn uta e o ot e Water an~-g~wer U--~tility~F~-uT~d-~'are being split 80% to the Water Utility <br />F~F-~-d~ the Sewer Utility Fund, with all other costs charged to the identifiable funds. <br /> <br /> Water Utili .ty Fund <br /> <br />Utilizing 100 new additions to the system for 1998, it is estimated that total revenues for 1998 <br />will be approximately $466,038 which includes interest earnings of $90,000. These revenue <br />projections do not include a rate increase for 1998. Expenditures are estimated to be at $366,306 <br />which includes depreciation (non-cash) of $160,000. This results in a budgeted operating <br />income for 1998 of'$99,732 and would increase the retained earnings accordingly. <br /> <br />Capital outlay type items, such as watermain looping and extensions of services will be dealt <br />with during early 1998 when the capital improvement program is developed. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.