Laserfiche WebLink
OCTOBER 1991 ' _~ Page <br /> <br /> CONCLUSIONS OF LAW <br /> <br /> 1. The assessor's removal of Green Acres classifica- <br />tion as 0f January 2, 1990 is hereby affirmed. <br /> LET JUDGMENT BE ENTEP~D ACCO1LDINGLY. <br />A STAY OF 15 DAYS IS ttEREBY ORDEI%ED. BY THE COURT, <br /> Earl B. Gustafson, Judge <br />Dated: October 24, 1991 <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> The "Minnesota agricultural property tax law," <br />Minn. Stat. § 273.111, more commonly known as the <br />"Green Acres" law, permits the taxation of farmland at <br />its agricultural value even though its market value for <br />another use might be higher· To receive this tax benefit <br />(which is a tax deferment), the owner must provide proof <br />that the land is presently being used for agricultural pur- <br />poses and that ii generates annual gross income of at <br />least $300 plus $10 per tillable acre. <br /> Petitioner owns 70 acres of land, with approximately <br />44 tillable acres, which has been classified as Green <br />Acres land since the early 1980s. Ia May, 1991, the Da- <br />kota County Assessor's Office, as part of a county-wide <br />Green Acres verification process, requested petitioner to <br />submit verification of the acres being farmed and the <br />gross agricultural income earned from the land in 1989. <br />Petitioner refused to submit any of the requested infor- <br />mation in writing, although he had some conversations <br />with people in the assessor's office. As a result, the as- <br />sessor removed the Green Acres classification for the <br />1990 assessment year, for taxes payable in 1991. Peti- <br />tioner appeals the assessor's action and requests rein- <br />statement of the Green Acres classification. <br /> Relevant portions of Minn. Stat. § 273.111 read as <br />follows: <br /> Subd. 3. Real estate consisting of ten acres or more. <br /> · . shall be entitled to valuation and tax deferment <br /> under this section only if it is actively and <br /> exclusively devoted to agricultural use as defined in <br /> subdivision 6... <br /> <br /> Subd. 6. Real property shall be considered to be in <br /> agricultural use provided that annually: (1) at least <br /> 33-1/3 percent of the total family income of the <br /> owner is derived therefrom, or the total production <br /> income including rental from the property is $300 <br /> plus $10 per tillable acre; .... <br /> <br /> Subd. 8. Application for deferment of taxes and <br /> assessment under this section shall be filed May 1 of <br /> the year prior to the year in which the taxes are <br /> payable. Any application filed hereunder and <br /> granted shall continue in effect for subsequent years <br /> until the property no longer qualifies .... The <br /> assessor may require proof by affidavit or otherwise <br /> that the property qualifies under subdivisions 3 and <br /> 6. <br /> (Emphasis added.) <br /> At trial petitioner explained that he refused to sub- <br />mit any income information in writing to the assessor's <br />office because to do so, in his opinion, would violate the <br /> <br />unreasonable search and seizure provisions of the United <br />States Constitution. <br /> Petitioner is certainly within his rights to refuse to <br />submit any information. However, we also find that the <br />assessor need not emend these special "Green Acres" tax <br />benefits to petitioner without "proof by affidavit or oth- <br />erwise that the property qualifie.s__.u_sde? subdivisions 3 <br />and 6." <br /> <br /> <br />