Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4 -- January 1997 <br /> <br />g.g. <br /> <br />t-lq <br /> <br /> Setback Requirement--Architect says sunroom addition is 'bay window' <br /> ?eter Schroeder Architects AIA v. City of Bellevue, 920 P. 2d 1216 <br /> (Washington) 1996 <br /> <br /> Peter Schroeder Architects planned a sunroom addition to a houSe in <br /> Bellevue, Wash. The house was in a residential zone with 25-foot rearyard <br /> setbacks. The proposed addition would extend 5 feet into the setback, but would <br /> be cantilevered over the ground. The entire rear wall would be made of glass <br /> windows. Seating would run the length of the wall. <br /> The Bellevue Land Use Code allowed "minor structural elements" to intrude <br /> into setbacks, but not more than 20 percent of the setback's minimum distance. <br /> Bay windows were considered minor structural elements, though the code did <br /> not define the term. The code also stated patios, platforms, eaves, decks, porches, <br /> balconies, greenhouse windows "and similar elements of a minor character" <br /> were minor structural elements. [The city has since amended its building code <br /> so the only minor structural elements that may extend an enclosed floor area <br /> into a setback are chimneys and bay windows that protrude 18 or fewer inches <br /> into the setback. Ed.] <br /> The city's director of community development determined the addition was <br /> not a minor structural element because it had an enclosed floor area. The director <br /> also said the addition would violate the code's intent that minor structural <br /> elements not affect adjacent properties as buildings would. A city hearing officer <br /> upheld the decision, stating the addition was not a bay window because a window <br /> was typically a hole in a wall, not an entire wall itself, and the addition was too <br /> big to be a "minor" element. <br /> A court reversed the city's decision, ruling the proposed addition complied <br /> with the building code. <br /> The city appealed. <br /> DECISION: Affirmed. <br /> The part of the addition that intruded into the setback was a bay window, so <br />it was a minor structural element. It extended only 5 feet into the setback, <br />which was 20 percent of the setback. <br /> According to Webster's dictionary, a bay window was "a window or series <br />of windows forming a bay or recess in a room and projecting outward from the <br />wall in a rectangular, polygonal, or curved form." The portion of the sunroom <br />that extended into the setback was such an area. It was made of a series of <br />windows, it formed a recess in the sunroom and it projected out from the rear <br />wall of the house. <br /> The code's language clearly allowed bay windows to extend into setbacks, <br />so the intent of the code or the director's interpretation of it were not determinative. <br /> The definition of bay window included recesses in a room, not just openings <br />in a wall, and did not limit them to any particular size. The code specifically <br />stated bay windows were minor structural elements, so they could be large or small. <br /> The city had to interpret its code as it was written. "It is unreasonable to <br /> <br /> <br />