Laserfiche WebLink
SECTION 8.6.2 OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT STATES <br />THAT: (PARAPHRASED) <br />"THE CITY MAY PlOT LEVY AN ASSESSMENT FOR ANY <br />COMPONENT OF AN'Y PROJECT ... AGAINST A PROPERTY <br />WHOSE OWNER ELECTS TO REMAIN ON A FUNCTIONAL <br />PRIVATE ... SYSTEM", <br />THIS SLAM THE DOOR APPROACH WRITTEN INTO THIS <br />AMENDMENT FRANKLY SCARES ME AS A PROPERTY <br />OWNER WITH A PRIVATE WELL AND SEPTIC SYSTEM <br />IN THE CITY OF RAMSEY. <br />IT DOES NOT LEAVE AN OPTION FOR SITUATIONS THAT <br />MAY ARISE IN THE YEARS TO COME. <br /> <br />IF A PROPERTY OWNER LIVES NEAR UNDEVELOPED LAND <br />AND AN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AFFECTS THEIR <br />PROPERTY, THOSE ARE THE RISKS THAT ARE ASSUMED <br />WHEN THEY PURCHASED ADJACENT TO THAT <br />UNDEVELOPED LAND. <br />AS A OWNER OF PROPERTY THAT WAS ADJACENT TO <br />UNDEVELOPED I. AND, ! HAVE HAD FIRST HAND <br />EXPERIENCE WITH THAT ISSUE. <br />WE DID NOT AGREE WITH EVERYTHING THAT WAS PUT IN <br />PLACE, NOR DID WE WRITE UNNECESSARY AMENDMENTS <br />TO UNDERMINE THE CURRENT CHARTER. <br />! SEE THIS AMENDMENT AS WRITTEN WITHOUT REGARD TO <br />POSSIBLE FUTURE CONSEQUENCES. <br /> <br />THIS PROPOSED AMENDMENT MAY SOUND GOOD IN <br />THEORY, BUT, ARE YOU AS A COUNCIL GOING TO BE ABLE <br />TO GRANT AN E;XCEPTION IN EXTENUATING SITUATIONS? <br /> <br /> <br />