Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> <br />ACTIVITY 1992/Rate 1993/Rate 1994/Rate 1995/Rate <br /> <br />Assault 80/4.7 69/4.1 65/3.8 91/5.4 <br />Burglary 121/7.1 94/5.5 118/6.9 74/4.4 <br />Drugs(all) 5/.29 6/.35 9/.53 12/.70 <br />DWI(all) 136/8 111/6.5 105/6.2 116/7.0 <br />Criminal Sex 29/1.7 17/1 14/.82 13/.82 <br />Runaway 61/3.6 44/2.6 45/2.6 74/4.4 <br />Disturb Peace 98/5.8 80/4.7 70/4.1 83/4.9 <br />Vandalism 275/16.2 326/19. 319/18.8 277/16.3 <br />Theft 376/22.1 372/21.9 381/22.4 325/19.2 <br />Vehicle Theft 49/2.9 46/2.7 56/3.3 40/2.4 <br />Weapons 17/1 11/.64 12/.70 16/1 <br />(carrying) ........................ <br />Receive 5/.29 6/.35 13/.70 23/1.4 <br />Stolen Property ...................... <br />Domestics 306/18 332/19.5 387/22.8 371/21.9 <br />Juvenile- 38/2.2 5/.29 11/.64 29/1.7 <br />Alcohol ........................ <br /> <br />Note: The vertical columns represent the year in which the ACTIVITIES took <br />place and, after the slash, the rate per 1,000 population of Ramsey (17000 was used) <br /> <br />I put these figures together for this monthly report for informational purposes since <br />the Mpls. Tribune recently published figures showing that the crime rate in the inner <br />suburbs had dropped while the rates in the outer ring suburbs has increased. The <br />above figures would need much more intense scrutiny before any conclusions could <br />be drawn and even then I am not too sure that the conclusions would be particularly <br />valid. If anybody is interested in discussing this please contact me. MGA <br /> <br /> <br />