My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/23/1996
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1996
>
Agenda - Council - 04/23/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 3:30:44 PM
Creation date
9/23/2003 2:04:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/23/1996
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
327
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> <br /> I <br />'1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />'1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />8. As mentioned iabove, there is a substantial amount of outside storage occurring, and it is visible <br /> from 142nd Avenue, Ramsey Boulevard, and T.H. #10. <br />9. It is Staff's option that clear fire lanes are not being maintained in the work yard. <br /> 10. Alloy has not filed a contingency action plan with the City. <br /> 11. Staff noticed 2 or 3 trailers on the site. Alloy indicates these trailers are used to store ash until <br /> shipping is Warranted and to store materials received that are incidental to the aluminum <br /> processing until enough has accumulated to warrant transfer to a recycling facility. If this is the <br /> case, then it would appear that these trailers are not being used for permanent long term <br /> storage. <br />12. The item of the CUP requiring that all operations and storage be in an enclosed building <br /> conflicts with the items limiting outside storage and screening outside storage. These terms of <br /> the CUP need some redef'ming. <br /> <br />Jon Schwartzmanl owner of Alloy Recovery Company, stated that his family also owns the scrap <br />yard in Anoka and they have been in this business many, many years. He explained that there are <br />a lot of regulators~ in this business and permit requirements are constantly and rapidly changing. <br />He stated that he works most closely with the MPCA. He noted that he talked with Dave Harmon <br />at Anoka County, ,telling Mr. Harmon that he wasn't aware of any hazardous waste and the permits <br />required by Anoka County. Mr. Harmon did not see a problem, and Mr. Schwartzman is currently <br />working with hin~ on this. Regarding the Air Quality Permit, Mr. Schwartzman stated they did <br />have one when they fa'st opened but were soon advised that they did not need one. Now the rules <br />have changed, and one is required. Mr. Schwartzman reported that he received a letter from <br />Rhonda Johansonl at the Enforcement Unit of the MPCA and was advised that his permit is in <br />limbo because it i~ stuck in the computer. Mr. Schwartzman stressed the fact that he needs to stay <br />in line with the MPCA because that's his business. He went on to discuss the regulations of the <br />MPCA, noting that his facility is inspected more than the average. Mr. Schwartzman concluded <br />that he is not trying to hide anything, that he is just trying to be a good businessman. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer inquired if there has been any complaints against Alloy Recovery. <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik responded that there have been observations in passing regarding the black smoke but <br />there have been no formal complaints. <br /> <br />Mr. Schwartzman questioned, if the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) doesn't require <br />yearly furnace emissions testing, why does the City find it necessary. <br /> <br />Chairperson Bawden wondered "how do we know what's coming out of those stacks?" <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik responded "we do know that when there is a problem, it is difficult to get the EPA out <br />to check on it." <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski recalled there has been a history of problems with this type of facility. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission proceeded to address the remainder of the 12 items outlined above. <br /> <br />With regard to #4 (outside storage), Mr. Schwartzman stated that with the expansion, they still <br />expect to store the ~steel outside the building. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer inquired if the applicant could get back to the originally allowed 30' x 50' <br />area, and Mr. SchWartzman replied that it would not be a problem. <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik then advised that the only screening (#8) needed would be the 30' x 50' area. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/March 4, 1996 <br /> Page 13 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.