My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/11/1996
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1996
>
Agenda - Council - 06/11/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 3:32:21 PM
Creation date
9/23/2003 3:20:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/11/1996
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
446
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that it was initially proposed to extend sewer and water to the site <br />and bring it back down the frontage road. Mr. Al Kempf raised objection to that extension due to <br />the impact it woul~ cause to his property and to his neighbors. He reported meeting with Mr. <br />Kempf and a coup!e of his neighbors. Mr. Kempf attempted to notify neighbors further south of <br />the frontage road.; They were not opposed to having sewer and water extended. Mr. Kempf <br />indicated he did no.t wish to stand in their way but suggested an alternative route. Once sewer and <br />water is extended north to 162nd Street, it would go along I52nd and proceed up along the rear <br />lines of the property. It would basically serve the same functions and would be maybe at a lesser <br />cost. <br /> <br />When asked aboutithe costs of that alternative, Mr. Jankowski explained there would be the SAC, <br />WAC, and trunk f~es. There would be the cost of physically getting the pipe up to the residences, <br />plus meters, plumbing, etc. Upon inquiry if it would be about $4,000 per neighbor, Mr. <br />Jankowski repliedyes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman had a problem with the owner not dedicating 66 feet of right-of-way <br />on Highway #47 like all the other developers have been doing. He wanted to see all developers <br />treated the same. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowsld responded that the developer will dedicate that 27 feet and asked to be paid for that <br />additional 10 feet. ! It would not change. He's asking his transportation fee be credited for that I0 <br />feet. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that's been our policy is that everyone donate their fair share of <br />the right-of-way. <br /> <br />Blaine Edmundsot!, Developer, stated the difference is he does not know what will happen with <br />the impact fee. Tl~Ss has not been approached by other developers before us. It's a transportation <br />impact fee, He asked what's pan of the impact fee - how it all comes together. He felt this could <br />be worked out in the developers agreement but would like to discuss it further. He did not have a <br />problem with the ~:0 feet but wanted to see what would happen with the impact fee. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman questioned the drainage. <br />Mr. Jankowski replied it drains over what will be Germanium Street It drains to the north to a <br />pond on the comr~ ouflot and the overflow will be brought back down to the south and be <br />discharged into th~ highway ditch and get back to the wetland. We will need to provide an outlet <br />for this wetland ini 1996. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman inquired who would be financing this outlet. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski anticipated storm water improvements will be funded jointly by the drainage <br />districts and by de~telopment. <br /> <br />Councilmember ~rnmerman inquired of the cost to which Mr. Jankowski thought between <br />$50,000 and $100,000. <br /> <br />A lengthy discussion ensued about the wetland outlets. The outlet system would have benefit, <br />however, we are developing more so part of the developer's responsibility is joint funding. <br /> <br />Motion by Counci,lrnember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beahen to grant preliminary <br />plat approval to the Brandseth plan dated January 19, 1996, contingent upon compliance with the <br />January 30, 1996 City Staff Review Letter. <br /> <br />City Council/February 13, 1996 <br /> Page 21 of 32 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.