Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br />:1 <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />alternatives to whit has been presented. The second of the two amendments are not an alternative <br />to anything we presented. So really, there is only one charter amendment. The other is basically a <br />red herring. Mr. Hendriksen asked that Section 1.4 not be placed on the ballot as he feels it is not <br />an alternative to ahything the Ramsey Residents for Responsible Government presented. Section <br />410.10 says that:the City Council or other governing body may call a special election for the <br />purpose of amending the Charter when a petition is brought forward. The Charter Commission <br />has the right to submit a proposal to amend the Charter - they do not have a right to place it on the <br />special election ballot in conjunction with the resident's submission. Another special election could <br />be scheduled for: the Charter's proposed amendment. If this is what's presented, you will be <br />submitting two versions of Section 8.6. It's possible voters could approve both of them and now <br />you have two Sections 8.6 diametrically opposed to each other. This is irresponsible, it could be <br />litigated forever in court when you have other options to create that type of situation. He asked if it <br />could be stated On the ballot which question was proposed by the citizens. He added that, <br />however, since tonight is the date of delivery to the Council of the Charter's proposal, he <br />suggested Bill would concur that Council has 90 days from this evening to place proposal on a <br />ballot for anotherzspecial election. He felt that the petition by the citizens is the only question that <br />should be on the ballot. <br /> <br />Bernard Steffen, Chairperson for the Charter Commission stated that the citizens involved in this <br />process have beech generic in their intent - they are using a Charter amendment and maybe they <br />should have used an ordinance instead. The Charter Commission made a recommendation as to <br />the two questions - (2 & 3) in response to the petition brought forward by Mr. Hendriksen and <br />group. They areirelated - they are not diametrically opposed. In question #1, the changes are <br />extreme - it is retroactive. The Charter Commission is proposing a middle ground. We are saying <br />this might be a regsonable mechanism. He noted the comments about the petition presented by the <br />citizens and the proposal by the Charter Commission. He pointed out that the Charter Commission <br />is also a group of' Ramsey residents. <br /> <br />Councilmember Beyer stated that since Council just received this language tonight, she was <br />confused. She wondered where 1.4 is coming from. <br /> <br />Mr. Steffen explained that the language there is founded on the idea of making things retroactive. <br />There's a certain amount of mischief that can be done if 5% of the citizens can take action to undue <br />City Council action. You can say do not do that again. The language is similar to that put in a <br />petition six months ago. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that 8.6.1 and 8.6.2 speaks of sanitary sewer and water for up <br />to 10 years. Does this pertain solely to new construction.'? <br /> <br />Mr. Steffen replied for up to 10 years after any resident is being assessed - for the last 10 years <br />you may request ~t referral longer for a hardship which would require City Council approval. This <br />would not only be for new construction - it would be for any system on the site for less than 10 <br />years. <br /> <br />Mr. Hendriksen stated that Mr, Steffen implied that we have not taken advantage of other options <br />to 51s,----We 'h-aV-ff~ a '~-l'oup--ffp'-~, people who own three lots. Three were against City utilities. <br />C<c0ncilmember Zimme~lt it was unfair that a 72 year old man with a pacemaker was being <br />fo-r'~,d.to-h'av~(2~!'-~y utdities. He asked the Charter Commission to look into it. The City Council <br />was asked to defer this assessment and they chose to ta.ke no action. The Charter Commission' <br />received this in December. They said it was the most democratic process. He felt an unfair <br />situation occurred. We have exhausted any other options. Three of the Council have turned a <br />blind eye and a deaf ear and were very abusive to three people. Now the citizens are ready to act <br />out of desperation, so now the Charter Commission is ready to act too. Mr. Hendriksen explained <br />that the Ramsey Residents for Responsible Government got 441 registered voters to sign a petition <br /> <br />City Council/April 23, 1996 <br /> Page 9 of 17 <br /> <br />/cO <br /> <br /> <br />