Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />CASE <br /> <br />REQUEST TO REZONE CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM B-1 BUSINESS <br />TO R-! RURAL RESIDENTIAL; CASE OF C. THOMAS AUSTIN <br /> By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Tom Austin is the fee title owner of a 4.7 acre parceI located south of T.H. #10 and west of the <br />Wayside Park. Although the property is zoned commercial, it has been used for residential <br />purposes for decades. The existing home is vacant and in disrepair and Mr. Austin would like to <br />repak it for use an accessory storage building and build a new home on the property. The existing <br />home is considered non-conforming or 'grandfathered' (pre-existing dwelling on commercial <br />property), 'and beCause it has been vacant for more than 6, it loses its 'grandfather' fights and <br />redevelopment offthe property must be in conformance with its zoning and current regulations. <br />Therefore, Mr. Austin has applied for a rezoning to enable him to build a new home on the <br />property. The following items are enclosed for your information: <br /> <br />a) <br />b) <br />c) <br />d) <br /> <br />Site location map <br />Draft public hearing minutes (will be available at the meeting) <br />proposed findings of fact <br />proposed ordinance <br /> <br />Noti fi ca ti on: <br /> <br />in accordance with State Statute, City Staff mailed notification of the public hearing for rezoning to <br />persons owning property within 350 feet of the subject property. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />in addition to the non-conformity with zoning, the existing dwelling on the property does not meet <br />the required setback from the Mississippi River as established in the Critical River Corridor <br />regulations. The new dwelling to be constructed by Mr. Austin would meet the current setback <br />requirements. <br /> <br />The 1980 Comprehensive Plan indicates that the existing zoning of the property was commercial, <br />that the existing use was residential, and that the proposed 1990 zoning map should convert the <br />zoning to R~ 1 Rural Residential. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing regarding the request for rezoning on <br />August 6 and there were no written or verbal comments submitted. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />The Planning Commission and City Staff recommend approval of the proposed rezoning. <br /> <br />Council Action: <br /> i/ce/e /cde 4 <br /> Adopt ResOlution 4/96-08- ] ~ adopting Findings of Fact 4/0 t~0relafing to a request from <br /> C. Thomas' Austin to rezone certai.n property from B-1 Business to R-1 Rural Residential. <br /> <br />-and- <br /> <br />Motion to: <br />introduce Ordinance//96- <br />to R-1 Rural Residential. <br /> <br />__ rezoning certain property in Section 19 from B-1 Business <br /> <br />CC: 8/13/96 <br /> <br /> <br />