Laserfiche WebLink
PAVEMENT MARKINGS <br /> <br />CHAPTER. 6 <br /> <br /> This low cost use of painted lane markings is <br /> a very simple attempt to change the pattern of <br /> driver behavior on any roadway, but par- <br /> ticularly on collector or minor arterials. This <br /> concept utilizes the painted lane line to <br /> develop a parking' reservoir and, in turn, <br /> creates the impression of a narrowed road- <br /> way, even if parked vehicles are not present. <br /> It ~s generally used Where the roadway width <br /> is greater than one lane, parking is allowed, <br /> and no lane is present. <br /> <br /> Effects <br /> <br /> Volumes. It is very unlikely that any reduc- <br /> tion in volume would be realized because, in <br /> reality, the capacity is not reached. <br /> <br /> Speed. The impression of a reduced roadway <br /> width does appear to affect drivers in a man- <br /> ner that tends to slow them down. The reduc- <br /> tion may not be dramatic, but it is a noticeable <br /> improvement. <br /> <br />Traffic Noise, Air Quality and Energy Con- <br />sumption. As the level of speeding and <br />potential hazardous driving is reduced, an <br />accompanying reduction in noise is possible. <br />However, there should not be high expecta- <br />tions for major reductions in noise levels. Air <br />quahty Or energy consumption improve- <br />ments are not expected. · <br /> <br />Traffic Safety. The use of the painted line to <br />delineate the parking ~ea not only creates the <br />impression of a narrowed roadway reducing <br />speed, but also discourages vehicles from <br />driving in or along the parking lane (especial- <br /> <br /> ly when parked vehicles are not present). <br /> This, in turn, reduces the frequency of at- <br /> tempts to pass on the right, use of the parking <br /> lane as a thru lane, and other hazardous action <br /> by irresponsible drivers. The net result is <br /> fewer lane conflicts, more defined driving <br /> patterns, and reduced potential for accidents <br /> of the pedestrian, passing on right, sideswipe, <br /> and parked vehicle variety. <br /> <br />Community Reaction. Generally speaking, <br />the reactions have been very positive. This <br />application is low cost, easy to do, involves no <br />construction and does not have negative im- <br />pacts on the adjacent property owners. <br />Neighborhoods have indicated that driving <br />patterns have improved and speeds are <br />reduced. Only complaints (from drivers) <br />have been that traffic moves slower thru the <br />area. <br /> <br /> Additional Considerations <br /> <br />The use of pavement markings may denote a <br />major street. <br /> <br /> Case Study <br /> <br />The City of Minneapolis has used this applica- <br />tion on two collector roadways in residential <br />areas (Portland Avenue South and Sunset <br />Blvd.) with the result being a better channel- <br />ized vehicle flow and reduced speeds. There <br />has not been adequate time to evaluate impact <br />on accidents. <br /> <br />Improving the Residential Street Environment, May 1981, FHWA <br /> <br />Neighborhood Traffic Con2ol <br /> <br />January 1994 <br /> <br /> <br />