My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/27/1996
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1996
>
Agenda - Council - 08/27/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 3:34:55 PM
Creation date
9/24/2003 10:29:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/27/1996
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
221
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />SUBURBAN RATE AUTHO TY ANNUAIJ REVIEW 1994 I <br /> <br />JHS87296 <br />SU160-3 <br /> <br />The following is a brief summary intended for the city councils of Suburban Rate Authority ("SRA") member <br />cities. It highlights the major activities and achievements of the SRA during 1994. The SRA is a joint <br />powers association of 32 Twin Cities suburban municipalities that monitors rates and rate design issues of <br />electric, gas, telephone utilities and Metropolitan Council Wastewater Services. The SRA was very active <br />and successful in several far-reaching issues affecting member city ratepayers and Minnesota cities generally. <br /> <br />Telecommunications Legislation <br /> <br />In the fall of 1994, the SRA Board authorized counsel to participate in legislative issues affecting cities <br />relating to the alternative telephone regulation bill (local service de-regulation) then expected to be offered <br />in the 1995 legislative session. The SPA assisted the lobbying efforts of the League of Minnesota Cities in <br />two important issues relating to that legislation: clarifying and broadening the police power of cities in the <br />new competitive environment for a local telephone service and addressing cities rights to compensation for <br />telecommunications utility use of public property. As of the date of this report, those SPA supported issues <br />have been incorporated into the bill which passed out of both the Senate and House Committees and is being <br />debated in the legislature at the time of this Review. The Department of Public Service will be authorized <br />by this bill to issue a comprehensive report by February 15, 1996 recommending a uniform state policy on <br />franchise fees for use of public property by utilities. Currently no telecommunications companies to pay <br />franchise fees to Minnesota cities and the law is unclear regarding the rights of cities to require fees over and <br />above regulatory cost. The SRA advocated a clarification on this issue and actively assisted in the inclusion <br />of this study, in lieu of the right to require franchise fees in the current bill. The SRA will be actively <br />involved in the DPS study if this bill passes. <br /> <br />Model Telecommunications Permit Ordinance <br /> <br />The SRA also drafted a model telecommunications permit ordinance to establish uniform requirements <br />regarding important issues to cities in the new competitive telecommunications environment: permit fees, <br />location and relocation requirements, repair requirements, performance bonds, Gopher State One information <br />and other provisions. The telephone deregulation bill language broadening city police power would further <br />ensure the enforceability of these telecommunications permit ordinances. The Minnesota League of Cities <br />has requested that the model permit ordinance be used as a basis for the League's model ordinance for <br />distribution to its members. <br /> <br />Minnegasco 1994 Rate Case <br /> <br /> The SRA won a significant victory for residential ratepayers served by Minnegasco in limiting <br />increases in the fixed customer service charge Minnegasco sought. In 1993 Minnegasco won a 67% increase <br />(from $3 to $5) in a fixed non-usage based customer charge for its residential customers. Tiffs increase was <br />augmented by the elimination of a credit for gas usage. In the 1994 filing, Minnegasco sought again to <br />increase its $5 charge to $6, stating that it intended to continue these increases in subsequent rate filings. <br />The SRA was the sole party to criticize this increase as contrary to conservation goals established by the <br />legislature and otherwise unsupported by evidence in the record. The DPS supported the increase. The PUC <br />agreed with the SRA and denied Minnegasco's increase, citing conservation concerns and lack of customer <br />acceptance, This PUC decision has ramifications for both gas and electric utilities and places a greater burden <br />on the utilities in future rate filings to justify an increase in non-usage based charges. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.