Agenda - Council - 08/27/1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

issue. He explained that Staffcomensus was that fair market value was $26,000 an acre, and at thai value the cash contribution would be approximately $35,000. Motion by Commi.~sioner LaMe. re and seconded by Commissioner Skinner that a land dedication at th~ eastern edge of Outlot A (~t tkts time) in lieu of part ofth~ developers cash due for the area that is to be subdivided now, be paid in cash. Motion carded. Voting Yes: Vice Chair Johns, Commissioners LaMe. re, Skinner, A.sfahl, Droegemueller, and Ostmm. VotingNo: None. Absent: Chairperson Coolc Case #2: DETER/VI/NE PARK DEDICATION FOR ~ BIJNT ADDITION ParksiUtilities Supervisor Boos explained that the Hunt Addition was a minor subdivision creating one new lot. He stated that the park dedication was the Rural Rate of $625.00 per new lot. Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos explained that the Hunt's have received a copy of fi:ds case and understand what is being requested of them regarding park dedication. Commissioner Skinner asked if the rate was $800.00 per new lot. Parks/Utilities Supervisor explained that the rate of $800.00 is for Urban lots. Commissioner Asfahl asked what was planned for the Demerest Brook Recreation District. Parks&Ytilkies Supervisor Boos explained that the Demerest Brook Recreation District does not have a lot of opportunity for development. Vice Chair Johns clarified that Fox Park is located La the Demerest Brook Recreation District. Motion by Commissioner Axfahl and seconded by Commissioner Sldnner to recommend City Council require $625.00 in park dedication be credited to the Demerest Brook Recreation District. Motion carried. Votfiag Yes: Vice Chair Johns, Commissioners Asfahl, Sldrmer, Droegemueller, LaMere, and Ostmm_ Voting No: None. Absent: Chairperson Cook. Case #3: MISSISSIPPI WEST PARK ParksrUtilities Supervisor Boos explained that the Mississippi West Park ts approximately 273 acres in size. He explained that the park plan has changed very little since the Park and Recreation Commission and City Council last reviewed it in 1993. Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos explained that the park will be used primarily for passive uses such as a nature area, boat dock, and bike trm]s. He explained that the County is interested in a swimming beach; however, the person that lives on this land did not like the idea of a sMmming beactk so it was temporarily withdrawn from the plan. 1~ :..rksKltilities Supervisor Boos explained that the City was concerned that the frontage mad continue along Riverdale Drive, to eliminate the t-Iighway #10 congestion. Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos explained that another concern was for a sedimentation pond for storm water located within the park He explained that the park plan references both concerns. Park and Recreation Commission/August 8, 1996 Page 3 of 8 I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I' I I I I