My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 07/14/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2011
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 07/14/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:21:36 PM
Creation date
7/8/2011 11:37:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
07/14/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
residential component. Staff has requested additional information on the number of employees to determine final <br />parking requirements. It appears there should be ample parking on site. <br />The proposed landscape plan appears to generally meet requirements with amendments and additional notes as <br />required in the Staff Review File. Given the current separation and tree cover between the proposed Lot 1 (B-1 <br />General Business District) and the proposed use, it is Staffs opinion that the buffer yard requirements between B-1 <br />and R-3 are satisfied. <br />The Civil Engineering plans are generally acceptable with additional detail included on the plans as noted in the <br />Staff Review File. <br />The Master Park and Trail Plan requires that a trail be constructed on site along Nowthen Boulevard. This trail <br />represents a critical trail link that completes a corridor that has had several segments constructed over the past <br />several years. Staff acknowledges the design constraints near the intersection of Nowthen Boulevard (CSAH 5) and <br />Saint Francis Boulevard (TH 47). Due to existing topography, retaining walls are required. Acknowledging the <br />additional construction costs and the benefit of this connection, Staff has prepared a proposal for a grant <br />opportunity for construction dollars through the Safe Routes to School program due to its proximity to Ramsey <br />Elementary School. There is no guarantee that the City will be successful in securing these dollars, and this trail <br />segment will remain a Stage I Improvement obligation of the Applicant. <br />Also in relation to trail obligations, the Applicant has proposed to construct the remaining segment between the <br />existing terminus of the Nowthen Boulevard Trail (terminating on the Lord of Life Campus) and the proposed Lot <br />1. Depending on the outcome of the Minor Subdivision process, these improvements outside of the proposed Lot 1 <br />may be considered off site and eligible for credit against Trail Development Fees as required by the Minor Plat. <br />The Trail Development is a mechanism the City has implemented to ensure connectivity of its trail system by <br />ensuring a funding stream for necessary off site improvements to connect various segments. All trails on private <br />property must be encumbered by a perpetual trail easement plus an additional five (5) feet for maintenance <br />purposes where feasible. <br />Finally, in relation to trail obligations, the City's policy is that trails shall be constructed, at the cost of the developer, <br />on both sides of all State, County, State Aid, and Collector roadways. This policy is implemented by the Master <br />Park and Trail Plan. This Plan indicates a trail construction obligation along Saint Francis Boulevard (TH 47) on <br />Lot 2. Staff will be prepared to discuss various options for this trail linkage. <br />The Fire Department has requested additional detail be added to the plans in regards to public safety access to the <br />structure. In addition, minor modifications to the location of certain hydrants has been requested. <br />The request has been sent to Mn/DOT and Anoka County Highway as required. Mn/DOT has responded that a <br />drainage permit shall be required as outlined in their response letter. Staff is awaiting a response from the Anoka <br />County Highway Department. <br />Funding Source: <br />All costs associated with reviewing the request are the responsibility of the Applicant. <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends approval of the Sketch Plan and Site Plan. <br />Committee Action: <br />The Sketch Plan provides the Planning Commission an opportunity to review the concept of a plat/subdivision <br />request on provide feedback on the request. No formal action is necessary. <br />Motion to recommend that the City Council approve the Site Plan for Stoney River. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.