Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br /> <br />PAVEMENT MA RKI_NG S <br /> <br />CHAPTER. <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br />,I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> This Iow cost use of painted lane markings is <br /> a very simple at. tempt to change the pattern of <br /> driver behavior on any roadway, but par- <br /> ticularly on collector or minor arterials. TI-ds <br /> concept utilize~ the painted lane line to <br /> develop a park. ing reservoir and, in turn, <br /> creates the impression of a narrowed road- <br /> way, even if parked vehicles are not present. <br /> It is generally used where the roadway width <br /> is greater th~m one lane, parking is allowed, <br /> and no lane is pi'esent. <br /> <br /> Effects <br /> Volumes. It is Very urdikely that any reduc- <br /> tion in volume Would be realized because, in <br /> reality, the capa6ity is not reached. <br /> Speed. The impression of a reduced roadway <br /> width does appear to affect drivers in a man- <br /> ner that tends to slow them down. The reduc- <br /> tion may not be dramatic, but it is a noticeable <br /> improvement. <br /> <br />Traffic Noise, Air Quality and Energy Con- <br />sumpfion. As ~he level of speeding and <br />potential hazardous driving is reduced, an <br />accompanying reduction in noise is possible. <br />However, there shou/d not be high expecta- <br />t-ions for major reductions in noise levels. Air <br />quality or energY consumption improve- <br />ments are not expected. · <br /> <br />Traffic Safety. The use of the painted l/ne to <br />delineate the parking area not only creates the <br />knpression of a narrowed roadway reducing <br />speed, but also discourages vehicles from <br />driving: in or along the parking[ lane (especial- <br /> <br /> ly when parked vehicles are not present). <br /> This, in turn, reduces the frequency of at- <br /> tempts to pass on the right, use of the parking <br /> lane as a thru lane, and other hazardous action <br /> by irresponsible drivers. The net result is <br /> fewer lane conflicts, more defined driving <br /> patterns, and reduced potential for accidents <br /> of the pedestrian, passing on right, sideswipe, <br /> and parked vehicle variety. <br /> <br /> Community Reaction. General/y speaking, <br /> the reactions have been very positive. This <br /> application is low cost, easy to do, involves no <br /> construction and does not have negative im- <br /> pacts on the adjacent property owners. <br /> Neighborhoods have indicated that driving <br /> patterns have improved and speeds are <br /> reduced. Only complaints (from drivers) <br /> have been that traffic moves slower thru the <br /> <br /> Additional Considerations <br /> <br />The use of pavement markings may denote a <br />major street. <br /> <br /> Case Study <br /> <br />The City of Minneapolis has used ti'ds applica- <br />tion on two collector roadways in residential <br />areas (Portland Avenue South and Sunset <br />Blvd.) with the result being a better charmel- <br />/zed vehicle flow and reduced speeds. There <br />has not been adequate time to evaluate impact <br />on accidents. <br /> <br />Reference <br /> <br /> Improving the Residential Street Environmentt May 1981/FHWA <br /> <br />Neighborhood Traffic Control <br /> <br />January 1994 <br /> <br /> <br />