Laserfiche WebLink
anywhere 1Tom a slight reduction in noise <br /> level t6 an increase in noise level. The noise <br /> level at the bumps/humps is dependent <br /> upon. the speed at which the vehicles traverse <br /> them. <br /> <br /> Because of their effect in slowing traffic, <br /> bumps/humps tend to have a negative im- <br /> pact on air quality and energy consumption. <br /> <br /> Traffic Safety. Traffic safety has not been <br /> found to be compromised with speed bumps <br /> and speed humps as long as proper design <br /> and installation procedures are followed <br /> when they are installed. Traffic safety benefits <br /> can be gained if speeding is involved. <br /> <br /> Cozn.mtmity Reaction. The initial reaction of <br /> the people living in the area of the installation <br /> is generally positive, while negative reaction <br /> can occur from those people who produce <br /> through traffic trips in the area. The reaction <br /> of the people living in the area can change <br /> over time. <br /> <br /> Legal. As defined by the Manual on Uniform <br /> Traffic Control Devices, 'speed bumps and <br /> speed humps are not traffic control devices. <br /> They are geometric design features and <br /> shouJd be designed and installed accordLngly <br /> us'.mg accepted engineering principles and <br /> judgement. <br /> <br /> Cost <br /> <br /> The cost of constructing a speed hump has <br /> been found to be in the range of $1,000 ~ <br />'$2,000. <br /> <br />Speed bumps cost approximately $500- <br />$1,000. <br /> <br /> The impact on maiutenance activities such as <br /> snowplowing and street sweeping is rrdni- <br /> mai. <br /> <br /> Speed bumps/humps can significantly im- <br /> pact large trucks, transit and school buses. If <br /> used on regular routes of these vehicle types, <br /> attention should be given to informing these <br /> drivers of proper operation necessary to min- <br /> Lrrdz e impacts. <br /> <br /> Case S~udy <br /> <br />A series of three speed humps were installed <br />on Homestead Drive in Appteton~ Wisconsin. <br />From a technical standpoint, the speed <br />humps were effective in reducing the 85th <br />percentile speed from 34 mph to 2.6 mph. One <br />year and five months after the installation of <br />the speed humps, they were removed. The <br />removal was prompted by a survey of the <br />neighborhood residents who directly abutted <br />the street that the speed humps were on. This <br />experience allowed for two winters of main- <br />tenance and found that their presence did not <br />create any unusual street maintenance <br />problems. It is interesting to note that the <br />vehicle speeds found to exist pri6r to the <br />installation of the speed humps returned <br />after the speed humps were removed. <br /> <br />Institute of Transportation Englneen~ ReMdenfia! SLm~et De~isn <br />and Traffic Control <br /> <br />A Prop<xt~ Recommended Prat'rice of the lrmtitute of Transporta- <br />tion Engineers by the Technical Council Speed Hump~ Taak Force <br />Guidelln~ for the Design and Application of Speed Huml:nk <br /> <br />..~ Neighborhood Traffic Control <br /> <br />January 1994 <br /> <br />24-2 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I: <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />