Agenda - Council - 10/22/1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I issue. He explained that Staffconsensus was that fair market value was $26,000 an acre, and at that value the cash contribution would be approximately $35,000. Motion by Commi~.'ssioner LaMere and seconded by Commissioner Skinner that a land dedication at the eastern edge of Outlet A (at this time) in lieu of part of the developers cash due for the area that is to be subdivided now, be paid in cash. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chair Johns, Commissioners LaMere, Skinner, Droegemueller, a~nd Ostrum. Voting No: None. Absent: Chairperson Cook. Case #2: DETERMINE PARK DEDICATION FOR THE It-UNT ADDITION Asfahl, Parks/Utilities Su~pervisor Boos explained that the Hunt Addition was a minor subdivision creating one new lot. He stated that the park dedication was the Rural Rate of $625.00 per new lot. Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos explained that the Hunt's have received a copy of this case and understand what is being requested of them regarding park dedication. Commissioner Skinner asked if the rate was $800.00 per new lot. Parks/Utilities Supervisor explained that the rate of $800.00 is for Urban lots. Commissioner ASfahl asked what was planned for the Demerest Brook Recreation District. Parks/Ut~ties Supervisor Boos explained that the Demerest Brook Recreation District does not have a lot of opportuflity for development. Vice Chair Johns clarified that Fox Park is located in the Demerest Brook Recreation District. Motion by Commissioner Asfahl and seconded by Commissioner Skinner to recommend City Council require $625.00 ih park dedication be credited to the Demerest Brook Recreation District. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chair Johns, Commissioners AsfahI, Skinner, Droegemueller, LaMere, and Ostmm. Voting No: None. Absent: Chairperson Cook. Case #3: MISSISSI~PPI WEST PARK Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos explained that the Mississippi West Park is approximately 273 acres in size. He expl,ained that the park plan has changed very little since the Park and Recreation Commission and City Council last reviewed it in 1993. Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos explained that the park will be used primarily for passive uses such as a nature area, boat dock, and bike trails. He explained that the County is interested in a swimming beach; however, the person that lives on this land did not like the idea of a swimming beach, so it was temporarily withdrawn from the plan. Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos explained that the City was concerned that the frontage road continue along Riverdale Di-ive, to eliminate the Highway #10 congestion. Parks/Utilities SuPervisor Boos explained that another concern was for a sedimentation pond for storm water located within the park. He explained that the park plan references both concerns. Park and Recreation Commission/August 8, 1996 Page 3 of 8