Laserfiche WebLink
TYP~ I <br /> <br /> TYPE Z <br /> <br />Ke~.~entL~J St <br /> <br /> A street closure, for the purpose of the <br /> Residential Neighborhood Traffic Control <br /> Tool Box, is defined as dosing a street either <br /> at one end or the other, or at a mid-block <br /> location. The purpose is to eliminate un- <br /> wanted through traffic. <br /> <br /> Street closing is a fah'ly common traffic con- <br /> trol technique. It is well documented in the <br /> "Residential Street Design & Traffic Control" <br /> published by Prentice Hall (1989). There are <br /> two basic types of closure to consider. Type 1 <br /> is defined as being near to the main street. <br /> The dosed street can no longer gain access to <br /> or from the main street. Type 2 is defined as <br /> being a far closure. The dosed street can only <br /> gain access to the main street Type 1 is most <br /> effective at reducing through frs_fi-lc volumes. <br /> Effec~s <br />Volumes. The 'impact on traffic volume is <br />drastic, reducing traffic volume to that which <br />is generated by the land use on the abutting <br />properties. To be most effective, the closure <br />must be visibl~ to the clrivers, so that the <br />driver does not run' onto' the street and then <br />finds it to be a dead-end. A "dead-end" sign <br />may be needed. Sufficient capacity' on the <br />alternative route is also needed. <br /> <br /> Spee& Again, the impact is drastic, reducing <br /> the speed to that normally associated with <br /> short dead-end residential streets. <br /> <br /> Traffic Noise, Air Quality a.nd Energy Con- <br /> sumptioru There should be a dramatic <br /> reduction in noise directly .related to the <br /> reduction in traffic volume.~. This is also ac- <br /> complished with an increase in air quality. <br /> <br /> Energy Consnmption. No change in energy <br /> consumption is expected since vehicle trips <br /> are not eliminated, but merely rerouted to <br /> main streets. <br /> <br />Traffic Safety. There is a substantial increase <br />in traffic safety. The neighborhood abutting <br />the closed street has less traffic and the traffic <br />that remains is ail local, usually well known <br />amongst themselves. There is also a safety <br />improvement to the main street. Traffic <br />entering" or exiting the main street is <br />eliminated at the closed street and relocated <br />at adjacent intersection with beRer traffic con- <br />trol. This portion of traffic safety has been the <br />driving force in the majority of street closures <br />described in the case study section. <br /> <br />Community Reaction. Reaction from people <br />who live on the street is usually very positive. <br />It is important to have all the residents in- <br /> <br />Neighborhood Traffic Control <br /> <br />January 1994 <br /> <br />20-1 <br /> <br /> <br />