Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />1 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br />;I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />IMPLEMENTATION OF CHAPTER 8 OF THE CHARTER <br /> By: Ryan R. Schroeder, City Administrator <br /> <br />CASE <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />At the October ~2, 1996 meeting, Council discussed passage of an ordinance implementing the <br />amendments to Chapter 8 of the Ramsey City Charter. Council directed that a public hearing be <br />held on Deceml~er 10, 1996, regarding the issue. In preparation of this public hearing, staff <br />presented a draft!ordinance implementing suggested language and a resolution providing for utility <br />availability charges pertinent to the issue at the meeting of November 12, 1996. These articles are <br />attached for you~ consideration. Also attached for background on the case is the background <br />memorandum from October 22, 1996. <br /> <br />As presented, ~e availability charge resolution provides the opportunity to recover fees from <br />properties receiving the availability of municipal utilities, but have not connected to them, or paid <br />an assessment ahd connection fees as a result of Chapter 8 of the Charter. Suggested is an <br />availability charg~ that reflects the minimum use charge for any residential customer on the system <br />who may not us~} the services (such as a snowbird). Currently that is $64/quarter. It was also <br />suggested that any such charge not take effect until after three years of availability of the system. <br /> <br />The ordinance provides protections to not only the City, but also future buyers of the properties in <br />question. Sectiori 6 of the ordinance provides notice to the public through property records that the <br />.property is subjec~ to a pending assessment. This is important to the City in that failure to disclose <br />~ssues of this natt!re seems to be cause for action. The City, therefore, needs somehow to provide <br />for notice of the utility availability to any future buyers of property having had exempted prior <br />utility connectionidue to Chapter 8. <br /> <br />Under Section 7, referencing functional private systems, language has not been provided for such, <br />but it would se~m that upon determination that the private system needs replacement or <br />refurbishing if it does not meet code connection should be required rather than allowance for total <br />replacement of th6 private system. <br /> <br />As noted above, Council scheduled this evening for a public hearing on this issue. There has been <br />some discussion ~at since the new Council will be the implementor of any adopted ordinance, <br />tabling would not be inappropriate. Alternatively, introduction of the ordinance would not subject <br />the new Council tO adoption or adoption without amendment. <br /> <br />Council Actionl <br /> <br />Based upon input at the public heari <br /> <br />Reviewed by: <br /> <br />City Administrator <br /> <br />CC: 12/10/96 <br />/jmt <br /> <br /> <br />