My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/10/1996
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1996
>
Agenda - Council - 12/10/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 3:38:26 PM
Creation date
9/24/2003 3:33:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/10/1996
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
527
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Intersections where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed. The multiway stop is a <br />permissible interim measure while arrangements are being made for signal installation. <br />An accident pt~oblem, as indicated by five or more accidents of a type susceptible to correction by a <br />multiway stop ~in a twelve month period. <br />Minimum traffic volumes as follows: <br />a) The total yehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average 500 <br /> vehicles p~.r hour for any eight hours of an average day. <br />b) The combination of vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street must average 200 <br /> units per hbur for the same eight hours, with an average delay to the minor street of at least 3 0 <br /> seconds per vehicle during the maximum hours, but; <br />c) When the 85th percentile approach speed of the major street exceeds 40 mph, the minimum <br /> vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirement. <br /> <br />Request for Yield _Signs <br /> <br />A "YIELD" sign assigns right-of-way to traffic on certain approaches to an intersection. Vehicles <br />controlled by a yield sign need stop only when necessary to avoid interference with other traffic that is <br />given the right-of-Way. Yield signs shall be placed in accordance with warrants outlined in the MN <br />HUTCD which incli~des the following: <br /> <br />I. At the entrance[ to an intersection where it is necessary to assign the right-of-way and where safe <br /> approach speed .'_.on the entrance exceeds 10 mph. <br />2. Where there is a separate or channelized right-turn lane without an adequate acceleration lane. <br />3. At intersections~where a special problem to be susceptible to correction by use of a yield sign. <br /> <br />Requests for Speedi_Limit Signs and Lower Speed Limits <br /> <br /> It shall be the policy of the City to post speed limit signs where required by law, notably at points of <br /> change from one sp~ed limit to another. Additionally, residential speed limit (30 mph) signs shall be <br /> posted on major subdivision streets near intersections with county or state highways. <br /> <br />It should be noted that Minnesota State Laws allow municipalities to post speed limits of 30 mph in an <br />urban district (define~l as areas having dwellings spaced at intervals of less than 100 feet for a distance of <br />one-quarter mile) an{t other streets at 55 mph. Speed limits under 30 mph are allowed in special zones <br />· such as school zonesI and alleyways. Other speed limits may be posted in 5 mph increments only upon <br />the determination of the Commissioner of Transportation subsequent to an engineering and traffic <br />investigation. It shall be the policy of the City to petition the Commissioner of Transportation, for an <br />engineering and traffic investigation study, when presented with a citizen request for such a study. <br /> <br />Request for Watch for Children Signs. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVE/41: (Current Policy and Staff Recommendation) <br /> <br />The request for watch for children and similar signs generally stem from parents' concern for their <br />children's safety in lhe streets and near their house. Unfortunately, the request is based on the <br />widespread but false belief that traffic signs provide protection. There is no indication that signs of this <br />type achieve the de~-ired safety results. Since children live in virtually every neighborhood, and <br />neighborhoods can chjange dramatically in child population in relatively short time spans, signs could be <br />posted on virtually e~ery residential block. In addition, if parents become less vigilant as a result of <br />these signs being post_ed, they may actually be doing a disservice to children's protection. It is therefore <br />the policy of the City to refrain from the posting of this type of sign. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.