11/07/96 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Board Member introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: RESOLUTION g96-10- A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT # RELATING TO A REQUEST FQR A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT AN A~C~SSORY STRUCTURE NEARER THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE THAN THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE WHEREAS, James and Michele Myslicki, hereinafter referred to as "Applicants", have properly applied for a variance from Section 9.11.02 of the Ramsey City Code to construct an accessory garage, nearer the front property line than the principal structure on the property generally known as 1681 lr~ Zirconium Street N.W. and legally described as follows: The No ,r~h Half of the South Half of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter Of Section 10, Township 32, Range 25, Anoka County, Minnesota; subject to the road ease, ment over the west 33 feet thereof. NOW ;THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: o o o 10. 11. That the ~Board of Adjustment conducted a public hearing pursuant to Section 9.03.05 of the Ramsey City Code on November 7, 1996 and that said public hearing was properly advertisegt and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated as a part of these findings by reference. That the subject property is zoned R-1 Rural Residential and is approximately 5 acres in size. That the subject property is surrounded by R-1 Rural Residential zoning developed with single family homes. That Seotion 9.11.02 of the Ramsey City Code does not permit the construction of accessory structures nearer the front property line than the principal structure. That the Principal structure on the subject property is located approximately 154 feet from the front property line. That the Applicant is proposing to construct an accessory garage approximately 95 feet from the front property line. That there are unique circumstances applying to the subject property that do not generally apply to Other properties in the district; namely sharp declines in topography in the side and rear yards in conjunction with mature tree growth and the location of the septic system. That the special conditions causing the undue hardship do not result from the actions of the Applicant. That similar variances have been granted in the R-1 Rural Residential district in the City of Ramsey. That the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. That the Applicant has stated that such variance is necessary for the preservation of a substantial property right similar to that possessed by other properties in the R-1 Residenti~ District.