Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC HEARING <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />CITY OF RAMSEY <br /> ANOKA COUNTY <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> <br />The Ramsey Planping Commission conducted a public hearing on Tuesday, January 2, 1996 at the <br />Ramsey Municip~ Center, 15153 Nowthen Boulevard N.W., Ramsey, Minnesota to hear input <br />regarding a prop6.sed amendment to Chapter 9 of City Code pertaining to storage of commercial <br />vehicles in residefitial districts. <br /> <br />Members Present:; Chairperson David Bawden <br /> Commissioner Ben Deemer <br /> Commissioner Paul Holland <br /> Commissioner Charles LaDue <br /> Commissioner Michael Terry <br /> Commissioner Bradley Thomd <br /> <br />Also Present: <br /> <br />CALL TO ORDER <br /> <br />City Engineer Steve Jankowski <br />Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik <br /> <br />Chairperson Bawden called the public hearing to order at 7:33 p.m. <br /> <br />PRESENTATION <br /> <br />Zoning AdminisWator Frolik stated that input on this matter will be received at tonight's public <br />hearing and at a l~ublic hearing scheduled for January 10, 1996. She distributed the proposed <br />ordinance amencl~ g Sections 9.02 and 9.11 of the Ramsey City Code to the Planning Commission <br />and copies were ~n)ade available to the public in attendance. <br /> <br />Chairperson Baw~len explained the reason for the second hearing is to allow for adequate time of <br />advertising the ptlblic hearing. <br /> <br />Zoning Adminisla'ator advised that if the Planning Commission doesn't make any substantial <br />changes, the proposed amendment can be forwarded to City Council on the fourth Tuesday of <br />January for its acl~ ption. Otherwise, if there are substantial changes, it will have to come back to <br />the Planning Cor/~nission. . <br /> <br />CITIZEN INPUT <br /> <br />Jim Connolly, 16235 Kamacite Street N.W. - wanted to know what was being controlled with this <br />ordinance. He in~:luired whether this was for the protection of the roads or the vehicles parked on <br />the property. He !stated there was no mention of gross weight or license identification. <br /> <br />Chairperson Ba~den stated that those answers could be found in the document. <br /> <br />Mr. Connolly, no,ting this refers to anything commercial, inquired whether it included the used car <br />salesman driving!one of his cars home. <br /> <br />Commissioner D*emer responded that if the car was identifiable, it would fall under the jurisdiction <br />of this ordinance: <br /> <br />Public <br /> <br />Hearing/Planning Commission/January 2, 1996 <br /> Page 1 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />