Laserfiche WebLink
CAS # I <br /> <br /> REQI~EST FOR AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; <br /> r CASE OF ALLOY RECOVERY COMPANY <br /> By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Alloy Reeove~ Company established an aluminum processing facility at 7060 142.nd Avenue <br />N.W. by a co~difonal use permit issued by the City in 1991. Alloy has applied for a conditional <br />use permit to qnlarge the facility with a 9,000 square foot addition to the principal building on the <br />site. <br /> <br />Notification: <br /> <br />State Statute r~xluires notification to all property owners within 350 feet of the subject property. <br />Staff attempted, to notify all property owners north to the AEC facility, west to Ramsey Blvd., <br />south to Hwy. ~10 and east to the Bury and Carlson site. <br /> <br />ObservationS: <br /> <br />The existing f~g.Mlity consists of a 2,100 square foot operations building and a 1,920 square foot <br />structure in wl~ch the melt furnace is housed. The applicant is proposing to increase the size of the <br />principal building to 11,100 square feet in order to get more of the operations into an enclosed <br />building. <br /> <br />The following items are enclosed for your information: <br /> <br />a) <br />b) <br />c) <br />d) <br />e) <br />0 <br /> <br />~ite location map <br />,Site plan <br />Current conditional use permit <br />~roposed findings of fact <br />atOSed conditional use permit <br />Planning Commission public hearing and meeting minutes dated <br />March 4, 1996 <br /> <br />The City Admittistmtor, City Engineer, Parks Supervisor, and Zoning Administrator visited the <br />site on Tuesdaf~ February 20, 1996. The Zoning Administrator has also been in communication <br />with the MinneSota Pollution Control Agency and the Anoka County Environmental Services. The <br />following deterr9~, inafions were made in response to the current conditional use permit terms: <br /> <br />1. Items #31 (Dust/Ash/Particulates) and Item #5 (Smoke): Staff had a telephone conversation <br />with Rhonda J0~anson in the Enforcement Unit of the PCA. It seems that there was not an Ak <br />Quality Permit ~ effect for the subject site and Alloy Recovery has made application for same. <br />Rhonda indicate~J that she inspected the site on September 19, 1995 and the facility appeared to be <br />in compliance Sd an air quality permit would most likely be issued. Alloy Recovery will be <br />issued what is e~ed an Option D Regulatory Permit because their emissions are very low. As <br />long as Alloy operates under the emission caps established in the Option D permit, they can make <br />changes to their! facility without filing for a new permit. Also because of their low emissions <br />levels, they arei not subject to annual inspections unless PCA receives coniplaints about the <br />operation. <br /> <br />2. Item g6 (Furnace Emissions and Monitoring): Alloy has not complied with the requirement <br />to conduct an armual emissions test and provide the City with a copy of the report. <br />3. Item #1~1 (Liquid Waste/Hazardous Wastes): In checking with Anoka County <br />Environmental Services, Staff was informed that Alloy does not have a hazardous waste generators <br /> <br /> <br />