My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/04/1996
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/04/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:00:51 AM
Creation date
9/25/2003 3:52:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
06/04/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. What l~vel of staff involvement or input do you expect in the appointment <br />process? <br /> <br />P&R: <br />1. Policies and procedures. <br />2. Help formulate questions to ensure they are fair, legal, consistent. <br />3. Uncomfortable with idea of only set questions - want freedom to ask followup <br />questions b~ed on responses. <br />4. Depending on the issues at the time interviews are conducted, may want to ask <br />different questions. Would require staff meeting with commission to revise questions <br />each time. : <br />5. One pers, on felt that set questions eliminate the individuality of individual <br />commissioners. Can we addres~ that by having each person's key question on the list? <br />6. Set list of questions. Be present to control propriety of process, pertaining to fairness, <br />harassment questions, level playing field. <br />7. Keeping track of terms, record keeping, basic housekeeping, advertising openings, etc. <br /> <br />Planning: <br />1. Minimal - they may have a <br />2. Minimal. <br /> <br />"political" agenda <br /> <br />EDC: <br />1. A "one page" updated periodically on job expectations, etc. for a commissioner. <br />2. Placement 'of the ads and initial contact with the candidate to notify them of the <br />interview date. <br />3. Limited, if any. <br />4. None. <br />5. Preliminary screening of candidates to check on prior experience and negative past <br />actions that Mil reflect badly on city or have cost city money. <br /> <br />Charter: <br />1. An applicatiron supplied and filled out. <br />2. I think the r more members involved, the more time it will take and possibly more <br />confusion. It should be upon a few board and commission teams for the appointment <br />process. <br />3. Receive candidates' applications and forward to commission. <br />4. They could be helpful in reviewing the applications. If there would be a large number <br />of candidates, they could possibly screen and narrow down the number of candidates to <br />be interviewed. They can coordinate the setting up of the interviews, contacting <br />candidates and :commissioners on time and location. <br /> <br />t? <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.