Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/03/1996

Home

8) That the Applicant has sta~ed that the traffic generated at the facility is ~nlma! beeauselthere is an operator on duty when the system is in operation (approxim~ly 20 days a year) and seldom are there employees on site when the system is not in operation. 9) That th~.Applieant has properly applied to the Sm__te ~re Marshal for the tank 10) That the(proposed use will/will not be unduly dangerous or otherwise detrimental to persons ~esiding or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. 11) That the ~roposed use will/will not adversely impair the use, enjoyment or market value of any surrounding property. 12) 13) That thc proposed use will/will not be designed, constructed, operated and maintain~t so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appear, race with the existing .or inten ~dgd character of the general vicinity and such use will/will not change the essential ~hameter of that area. That the proposed use will/will not be disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. 14) That the groposed use will/will not be ho,ordous to existing or furore neighboring 'uses. 15) That the iproposed use will/will not be served adequately by essential public facilities and services. 16) 17) 18)' That. the proposed use wilVwill not create excessive additional requirements at lmblic eo.~t for public facilities and services. That the Proposed use will/will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the That the pxoposed use will/~ not involVe uses, activities, processes, materials and equipment and conditions of operation that may be detrimental to any persons, property Or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of fumes or odors. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by CouncilmemberF and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: and the following abstained: and the following were absent: 7